Gotta See It: Maple Leafs lose after questionable offside review

After a review, the referees would rule that the Blackhawks were onside and the OT goal would count.

Views: 22071
Runtime: 1:3
Comments: 203

Tags for this video:

Find more videos in the: "17"
Uploaded by:
See more videos uploaded by


Author Amy van der Westhuizen ( ago)
sexual anybody identify smarter this casf?

Author Sheldon Farley ( ago)
problem is that Panarin draws the puck back past the blue line to make the pass to Hartman, looks like he's offside. believe rule 83 (or something like that) states that player can essentially put himself offside if he's in full control of the puck, and no doubt Panarin was. looks like the right call to me

Author Dennis ( ago)
Only you homers at Sportsnet would call that questionable.

Author taytayrmorton ( ago)
Pause a 0:44 it's blatantly offside lol. There's either a lot of biased Hawks fans in the comments or a lot of blind/uninformed people

Author theSkyFilms ( ago)
It looked like he made the pass before the puck completely crossed the blue line (if you check the blue line camera) he made the pass when it was half in the NZ and half on the blue line

Author Joshua McKenzie ( ago)
100% Onside No Question

Author vinyl79 ( ago)
The offside rule is stupid. If both skates are in before the puck, no matter what, should be offside !

Author soaringbullet ( ago)
Nothing questionable about it

Author Post2Post ( ago)
Those Jerseys though :)

Author TheCanadianSkillz ( ago)
The rule is super weird, they need to re-write if. Obviously in this case it's a good goal but the rule is still very strange.

Author Sod Laflare ( ago)
Gotta see it maple leafs lose but won't upload any goals from habs vs sens game

Author Kristy7226 ( ago)
It isn't questionable. Panarin had control of the puck. Not offsides. Hawks win. End of story.

Author Richard Harder ( ago)
WOW that's offside no doubt. 0.25 speed from 0:43 to 0:46. It's as clear as day.

Author Johnny ( ago)
That was offside but it doesn't really matter cause the Leafs would of just lost in the shootout like always. You can't pass the puck from the neutral zone to another player while you are already passed the blue line.

Author MrOrigins115 ( ago)
No Goal.

The puck left the Chicago Players stick prior to it entering the zone (fully crossing the blue line) thus putting the player who was passing it in an offside position because he is now across the blue line before the puck.

If the Chicago player had held the puck for another second, but him and the puck would've been in the zone.

I understand that you can skate backwards into the zone and not be called offside as long as you have control of the puck. That's why this is offside because the puck left the Chicago Players stick (making him no longer in control of the puck) before it entered the zone.

Author Elmo ( ago)
i think this is "questionable" only because its against hockey capital Toronto

Author Trenton Pombert ( ago)
What are those jerseys? Your one day late Toronto.

Author George Boccanfuso ( ago)
Ouzer it may be offside if he passed/lost control outside the blueline. I hate to say but he passed it on the blueline which makes it onside.

Author Fabio Ventresca ( ago)
Forget about this goal, what about that missed too many men on the ice call?

Author FMM8 ( ago)
I'm a Hawks fan and I can admit that was an offside, but what can you do. #HAWKSWIN

Author yoan yergeau ( ago)
you wont fool me by changing your shirts and team name ...

Losers Even After FIFTY Seasons!!!

Author Pound_Cake1 ( ago)
I think he passed it and didn't have control. offside.

Author BLT4LIFE ( ago)
So two Canadian teams face off for the division lead and sporstnetCANADA doesn't upload a single clip? You suck, sportsnet.

Author Ryan Scherbluk ( ago)
Wtf kind of jersey Is that Toronto

Author Shad Ali ( ago)
About as controversial as that ugly ass jersey

Author Matt TH ( ago)
So many bandwagon Blackhawks fans it's getting annoying.

Author joku joku ( ago)
how he can control the puck if he doesent have it anymore?

Author SickStick39 ( ago)
so many buthurt leafs fans haha

Author FiteMeIRLlilGaiBoi420 ( ago)
It's not like the Leafs were going to win in the shootout anyway.

Author Frank Kolton ( ago)
You would think that SPORTSNETCANADA would take the trouble to know the rules before labeling a video "questionable".  NHL rule 83.1  "However, a player actually controlling the puck who shall cross the line ahead of the puck shall not be considered “off-side,” provided he had possession and control of the puck prior to his skates crossing the blue line".

Author John Clink ( ago)
good goal

Author bawsified ( ago)
Questionable? He had control of the puck, I used to love this page but godamn it has gone down hill fast and is such a bias network.

Author Zachman ( ago)
as someone who loves the leafs and hates the hawks that was a good goal and just be glad that we at least got one point

Author gimmick ( ago)
lol what was gardiner doing?

Author Campbell Kane ( ago)
Why all the dislikes? Not even being biased here that was a good goal. This is no where near as bad as the wild offside goal vs Chicago earlier this season. I have a feeling most see the words "questionable offsides " in the title and Blackhawks jerseys in the thumbnail and automatically hit dislike.

Author Mustafa Syed ( ago)
I love Toronto's jersey. Is it just for St.Patricks Day?

Author nolla7 ( ago)
clearly offside is everyone drunk there hockey night in canada.

Author TheWillStrike ( ago)
All Chicago fans I saw in stands were fat/ hipsters/ foreign.

Author Tyler Jones ( ago)
The blatant non-call on CHI too many men penalty is what ruined this OT.

Author mike wellington ( ago)
When the announcers completely refute the title...

Author Ethan Minard ( ago)
But didn't he let go of the puck to pass before the puck fully crossed the line? So he didn't have possession, unless the rule allows the puck to just touch the line while u have possession, otherwise it shouldn't count

Author Doop55 ( ago)
If you go frame by frame you can see that although he crosses the blue line while in possession of the puck, he then passes (giving up possession) before the puck crosses the line. Therefore, he had crossed the blue line while the puck was still being passed between the hawks players and had not yet gone over the line. Looks like it should be offside

Author SantaClaus IsReal ( ago)
As a leaf fan, that was clearly not offside.

Author Unstumpable Trumpable ( ago)
Guess Steve Dangle isn't getting a St. Pats jersey

Author The_Chipmunk_ ( ago)
Go Leafs !!! Hawks .... Booooooo !! :-)

Author Reptoid ( ago)
freaking love those white and green jerseys

Author Malek Smadi ( ago)
I watched that live and called it that they would score after Toronto missed like 3 breakaways

Author Joe Danger ( ago)
The only reason they titled this "controversial" is because it was the Leafs.

Author Austin Hancock ( ago)
The play is within the rules so it is onside. With that said the rule isn't a very good one at all, Should be puck has to the first thing across the blue line.

Author Joey ( ago)
not very controversial, there is a written rule about this situation

Author footytang ( ago)
That's one rule they should have left alone. Puck has to cross the line before everyone else and you would avoid this kind of controversy.

Author ryan lapointe ( ago)
It isn't controversial you just want more views shithead smh

Author Dghvd hfhhb ( ago)
It's the Hawks of Course they will count the goal even though it's offside

Author Triple HHH ( ago)
Toronto's St.Pats jerseys look like Hartford Whalers jersey eh?

Author Chief Blackhawk ( ago)
Why not show some of the missed calls on the leafs lol. Not "controversial" enough?

Author Nick Raymond ( ago)
The Hawks are going to be an elite team for a long time

Author Eman C. ( ago)
Thumbnail had me thinking this was a retro video like wtf is that camera?

Author turarosicky ( ago)
you like it or not, it was a good goal, he had control over the puck(non-blackhawks fan)

Author spiral ( ago)
its offside, how does he have "possession" if he was passing it...

Author Austin Brossart ( ago)
controversial because it's in Toronto

Author hockeycub19 ( ago)
What was controversial about this?

Author Osnipes23 FIFA/NHL/COD ( ago)
I'm a massive leafs fan and we really needed the win but if you know the rules then you would know that it's a good goal any day of the week.

Author капіталістычны ( ago)
the st pats jerseys are beautiful

Author For your health ( ago)
Gardiner, poke check that. Fucks sake

Author baznitchandsons ( ago)
wtf is that camera on the blue line? Still using technology from the 80's

Author SpicyWeiner192 ( ago)
That wasn't questionable at all lol.

Author ouzer ( ago)
It's only controversial if you are clueless about the rules. A player in complete control of the puck can put himself offsides. Now if his linemate without the puck crossed the blueline before the puck, then that wouldn't count.

Author Bennett Desmarais ( ago)
The puck carrier made the pass when the puck was behind the blue line and both of his feet were in the offensive zone. He did not have control of the puck. No Goal.

I am a Leafs fan so I do have a bias opinion. If someone could explain something I missed, that would be great.

Author Batflip 09 ( ago)
The LeafsNet was trying to make it questionable. 😂😂😂

Author Scarce Is Not Fat ( ago)
goal or no goal, it seems that even when the leafs are decent, the bandwagons are still around.

Author BottleBoy ( ago)
Great game, and the acc seemed louder than usual.

Author DerpySquid 04 ( ago)

(like if you agree)

Author Big Red ( ago)
Love all of the bandwagon hawks fans there

Author Kevin Shields ( ago)
Good goal, had full control of the puck

Author Cat Snake ( ago)
Wow another another video on the leafs

Author C x ( ago)
Well, there's always next decade

Author TOR Hockeycards ( ago)
no it wasn't really that questionable it was a good goal.

Author TopThrillAnthony/ PGHL S12 New York Islanders ( ago)
but thats offsides

Author thefoolonthehill ( ago)
no goal

Embed Video:


Search Video

Top Videos


Analyse website