BBC - OJ Simpson the Untold Story

This program is an in depth investigation into new evidence that has been found surrounding the murder trial of O.J. Simpson.

Who did kill OJ's ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman? This is still a gripping tale. It may be five years on but this story hasn't lost its heady mixture of violence, race, sex and Hollywood glitz.

Five years ago, the world watched spellbound as OJ Simpson was acquitted of murder. And interest in the case remains as great as ever. Why, asks the BBC's former Washington correspondent Bridget Kendall, are we still obsessed?

Ask any American exactly where they were when the verdict in OJ Simpson's trial was announced and they will probably remember. It was one of those defining moments.

When the dramatic announcement came that OJ had been found "not guilty", the reaction was almost as stunning as the unexpected verdict. America was divided down the middle.

Five years since that moment, and still the ghosts in this weird and ghastly double murder have not been laid to rest. And it is somehow fitting that the latest investigation to unearth new clues into what might have happened - who did kill OJ's ex- wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman? - is not the result of police work, but a television documentary, OJ: The Untold Story. Once again, it is trial by television, a TV audience being invited to sift through the evidence and draw their own conclusions.

What is more, there are some startling new revelations and a real-life American private eye to help guide us through the maze of new circumstantial evidence. Not exactly a suave Raymond Chandler hero with deadpan delivery, Bill Dear is no Humphrey Bogart. But as a tenacious private detective from Dallas, Texas, he certainly proves that all those American crime novels got one thing right: one private eye with a bee in his bonnet and apparently boundless energy can get a whole lot further in coming up with new leads than an American city police department.

To begin with gruesome photos from the crime scene and eyewitness accounts from the LA police detectives reminds you of how they built their case, and convinces you all over again that surely the evidence against OJ was overwhelming.

But then comes the analysis: the evidence that does not add up.

Here the makers of this documentary have been careful not to be too categorical. They offer two sets of circumstantial evidence that point to two quite separate suspects and two quite different lines of inquiry. So who do they think did it? There is no final chapter to this new investigation. Watch it, and decide for yourself if you still think OJ is guilty.

Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 893,008
Added: 2 years
Runtime: 69:51
Comments: 3948

Tags for this video:  

Find more videos in the: "News"
Uploaded by: XXSASSTERXX1
See more videos uploaded by XXSASSTERXX1

Related Videos:

Dateline The People vs O.J. Simpson What The Jury Never Heard Full Episode.
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 112700

Views: 23865
GLEN ROGERS AND THE O.J CASE (Documentary) Glen Rogers - also known as "The Cross Country Killer" or "The Casanova Killer," is an American serial...
The JFK Assassination: Conspiracy, Photos, Facts, Autopsy, Documentary Evidence (2007)
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 1154509
Garrison was notable for being among the first to assert that there were two conspiracies: The first conspiracy being the one which engineered the...
The O.J. Simpson Murder Saga: 20 Years Later!
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 36603
**Fight Censorship on YouTube** United States -- The O. J. Simpson murder case (officially the People of the State of California vs. Orenthal...
Killer Girls : Documentary on Girls Turned Killers
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 2047011
Killer Girls : Documentary on Girls Turned Killers ....
Anna Nicole Smith - True Crime With Aphrodite Jones
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 215746
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 67912
Part 1 of 2. This two-part series consists of more than 7 hours of material taken from "Absolutely 100% Guilty", a 1999 made-for-video 12-hour...
"The 16 Year Old Killer" Cyntoia's Story (full documentary)
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 4114144
Anyone wanting to write to Cyntoia, please scroll down to the end of this description box. In 2004, Cyntoia Brown was arrested for the murder of a...
The Cleveland Captives What Really Happened?? BBC crime documentary kidnapping 2013
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 344531
Two teenage girls and a 20-year-old woman are kidnapped on the same stretch of road in Cleveland, Ohio. For 10 years they are missing presumed...
The Real Crime Story - Selena Gun Downed HD
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 3063085 'REEL CRIME/REAL STORY' TV SERIES TO FEATURE SELENA MURDER CASE EPISODE. The district attorney who led...
Deranged Killers: DC Sniper (2009)
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 286814
Criminal investigators race against time, hunting down John Muhammad and Lee Malvo as the pair carries out one of the most terrifying killing...
True Crime with Aphrodite Jones: Phil Spector (2010)
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 367558
An actress turns up dead at the home of Phil Spector and the music legend is charged with murder. Crime writer Aphrodite Jones uncovers videotape...
Judge to OJ: You are ignorant & arrogant. What you did was much more than stupidity. (Part 2)
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 477359
The Butchered Boys - The Family Murders
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 372679
Casey Anthony Case
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 331427
Casey Anthony Case
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 94975
2-and-a-half hours of highlights and witness testimony from the 1995 O.J. Simpson murder trial. First 110 minutes: ©1995 Cable News Network, Inc....
The OJ Simpson Lawyer's Verdict On Pistorius
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 149120
Robert Shapiro Talks Straight: Robert Shapiro is known as "the lawyers' lawyer", a grand master of attack and defence. Giving us unbridled access...
OJ Simpson Beaten Unconscious In Prison [Watch Now!!!]
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating
Views: 211185
True Crime with Aphrodite Jones: O.J. Simpson (2010)
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 146764
The Las Vegas kidnapping case that put former football great O.J. Simpson in jail was one of many highly publicized Simpson cases with a singular...
(FULL) Elizabeth's Story, A Meredith Vieira Special
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 377478
Airdate: October 4, 2013 Held captive in 2002 by religious fanatic Brian David Mitchell and his wife Wanda Barzee, 14-year old Smart was chained...
Death of Jayne Mansfield (GRAPHIC)
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 912454
OJ Simpson - 2004 Interview - part 1
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating
Views: 163856
interviewed 10 yrs after the murders by greta van susteren.
Top 10 Deadliest Women (serial killers, spree killers, thrill killers and more)
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 1342471
FBI Profiler Candice DeLong counts down the '10 Deadliest Women' featured on the show in seasons 2--4 as determined by viewer votes on...
Sins & Secrets Palo Alto, CA
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 326161
Iran's Secret Army
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating
Views: 638609
A 2013 production looking at the clandestine role of Iran's Revolutionary Guards in the Syrian conflict... (With thanks to NOS/Nieuwsuur &...


Author Chas Grav (18 days)
The problem with the OJ case is that, no matter how you slice it, you wind
up with disturbing, nagging questions that it just doesn't make sense that
OJ 'plans' a murder, with hat and gloves to boot, but makes no plan to hide
his involvement or provide a reasonable alibi. The allegation by police
that it is a 'rage' killing, and yet they present evidence of fairly
thought-out planning, which belies the notion of a crime of passion. The
appearance of planning belies the assertion of a crime of passion, as does
the rather expert 'execution,' if you will, of two individuals with
remarkable skill and not a peep from either one heard. The loss of a hat
belies a sense of planning, not to mention the bumbling loss of a glove as
well, and then, that's not enough, the loss of the OTHER glove AT THE HOME
OF THE ALLEGED PERPETRATOR! It's beyond credible. Too much of the evidence
seems too pat, and there is no doubt evidence collection was compromised.

The duty of a jury is NOT to figure out 'whodunit.' Their job is to
determine if the State has surmounted the high hill of constitutional due
process and presented a case beyond reasonable doubt (that is, if you have
any reason to doubt, the case fails). The State failed. Whether OJ
committed murder or not is irrelevant. The well-being of the rule of law,
constitutional liberty, and safeguards against the power of the State
outweigh any other concern. Jurors are not there to protect a defendant
from the power of the State; they are there to protect THEMSELVES against
encroachments on the freedom of citizens from unreasonable state

Author Phillip Ofori - Amoyaw (1 month)
i think the reason why black people were so happy about oj being released
was because for once a black man skipped jail when there's been so many
blacks who have innocently been sent to jail for a crime they did not

Author charles baker (3 months)
Amazing how many black folks jumped for joy for a killer getting away with

Author Mario Pinto (2 months)
Prison stabbings are the most frequent, and documented knife attacks,
injuries sustained through these attacks would give a basis of injuries to
the perp's fingers, arms, and body, which Simpson had none of except the
fingers cuts, which is on his left hand, the same hand supposedly wielding
the knife... does not add up...

Author LiquidMetalX7 (1 month)
I always knew deep down that he didn't do it.

Author chinacane (3 months)
The LA racist police actually did believe that OJ did it, so they tried to
fix it so that he would be convicted but subsequently backfired on them.
The reality might be somewhere in the middle. It seems that OJ was there
probably after the murders were committed, either by his son or the drug
dealers that OJ and his ex-wife were involved with. The nail cuts on his
finger could be OJ trying to stop with son at some point in this saga or it
could be an unlucky coincidence.
The fact that Goldman was working at a restaurant known to he a den of drug
pushers, several of whom were murdered, shows that Goldman may have been
just another victim along with his girlfriend. Drug deals gone bad or
Nicole talking too much as is mentioned in this video.
It could also be that the drug dealers killed the two in OJs presence and
told him to take the wrap or else they would kill his children too.
I don't believe OJ killed these two. He is not psycho enough but it seems
his son is, as are drug dealers.
The cuts on his finger could be pure coincidence. I've come across
coincidences in my life time that have astounded me. Had those coincidences
been associated with a murder case lets say, I would have looked very
guilty to a jury.

Author Amidat (3 months)
How did the neighbors not hear screams?? Where was the dog that had blood
on it's paws yet didn't intervene in the attack?

Author hanni6022 (1 month)
OJ got away with killing two white people, what about the millions of black
slaves that were killed by white people who got away with it without even
going to trial

Author Shan Church (2 months)
What about Glen Rogers the serial killer who was involved with Nicole
Simpson and did work at her place around the time of the murders. What
about Glen Rogers family who came forward with evidence. I am so sick of
people trying to keep racial tensions brewing over this case and profit
from the murders of two people. Why didn't they scrap the victims finger
nails for evidence. If they fought the attacker surely dna evidence would
be under their nails What about the missing Oj Simpson blood viles that
the police "lost" before they "found" the blood drops on the socks. What
about the fact that the gloves just didnt fit. How many gloves shrink so
much in rain or snow that they just dont fit anymore. Glen Rogers is white
with blind hair and blue eyes so I guess making the famous black athlete
the guilty one the more sensational choice. who cares about justice.

Author Wardrumsfire (2 months)
devoted wife mother. yeah so devoted she ended up . divorcing her
husband.taking his stuff. and sleeping with all the waiters of this resto.
,yup sounds like a nice women to me. tiss lol. ignorant Americans always
have to make women into victims!!

You wanna use and abuse Men. If you get killed for it. Don't expect my
sympathy. No sympathy for the devil folks. In The United States 80% of all
divorces are applied for by Women. THAT'S HOW SWEET THE WOMEN REALLY ARE!!

Even if O.J is guilty.I sure have understanding for His motives!! when you
keep using a man,. you will end up paying for it. common logic folks!!

If shes so innocent and devoted during her marriage,. then that reflects on
O.J keeping His women in check. look what she did after the divorce. she
could not get enough sex. wild. stupid. and all at the expense of O.J.

just like all these divorced women. don't try and milk sympathies from me
for Nicole. i am one of those guys who see's through the non sense. and O.J
is a perfect MGTOW MALE. don't mess with MEN LADIES this is what happens
when you use men!!

Author Anne Morrissette (1 month)
Still think he did it. Thee police just botched the case so bad. How they
gonna search his house when he wasnt even there intially??? His actions
immediately following murders were too suspicious

Author Harry Callahan (3 months)
The Bruno Magli shoes hung him, denies ever owning a pair, why deny owning
a pair to start with ah? only 300 sold and can be seen in the blood what
was washed away just 36 hours after the murders! cut on hand, no alibi,
fancy dress costumes, Nicole says if she ever ends up dead OJ done it...and
what you know.

911 calls Nicole Brown-Simpson made to police on October 25, 1993

NICOLE: Can you send someone to my house?
DISPATCHER: What's the problem there?
NICOLE: My ex-husband has just broken into my house and he's ranting and
raving outside the front yard.
DISPATCHER: Has he been drinking or anything?
NICOLE: No. But he's crazy.
DISPATCHER: What is he doing there?
NICOLE: He just drove up again. (She begin to cry) Could you just send
somebody over ?
DISPATCHER: Wait a minute. What kind of car is he in?
NICOLE: He's in a white Bronco, but first of all he broke the back door
down to get in.

Real innocent.

Author Bubbles177 (3 months)
My theory, his son committed both murders, then panicked and called his
dad. His dad came and tried to get rid of as much evidence while he was
there, but couldn't get rid of all of it. I believe he knew his son did it,
but would rather people think he did it, that's why he was so willing to
turn himself in when they came after him and why he never really made any
comment about the whole thing. One thing that I know for sure is parents
would rather take up for something than to have their children be at blame
or fault.

Author Mrhycannon (1 month)
Reopen the case.? What about double jeopardy.?

Author Daniel Petersen (5 months)
I don't think O.J was guilty, the police assumed it was him from early
stages, this is a key fact, it changed the way that they interpreted the
evidence. They made the evidence fit the theory, not the other way round.
And while I'm having a moan, what INCOMPETENT IMBECILE turns up to a crime
scene and leans against a railing, having walked through and over valuable
evidence, and rubs his shoes everywhere? It is just stupid and I think that
he should be identified and given a right bollocking!

Author Maximilian Dummnichtswürdigkerl (5 months)
THat is what you should expect from mixed race relationships

Author reg profant (16 days)
Cleopatra b.s. forget about his hands .They wouldn't prove anything except
he damaged them. Then the question would be did he damage them before he
got there, on the way there, on O.J. or someone else. A whole new can of
worms the prosecutor wouldn't go there. The one main thing I keep having to
bring up that's uncontestable is the preservative in the blood found
proving it had to be planted. Obviously we don't have preservatives in our
blood. The case should have been dropped on that alone. There was obviously
more going on than they let out.

Author Nature's Child (17 days)
There are people commenting here either to rubbish OJ as he is black or
Nicole because she is white- Cretins! Two people were horribly murdered,
they DID NOT deserve to leave this earth in such a way. No matter how much
hurt there is, or what happened in the past, they did not deserve to die.
If OJ behaved in such an erratic way afterwards, he should be treated with
suspicion, as anyone else should. STOP focusing on their colours and look
at everything concerned!

Author Aishi Veen (2 days)
what if the ppl who killed Nicole and her boyfriend paid the police to set
up OJ and keep quite about the true killer(s). 

Author sluten anstalt (1 month)
The bastard is set to die in prison now anyway after his completely
distinct felony conviction, which provides evidence of his violent
character. The kind that did not exist back in 1994.

Author Theo Triumphman (2 days)
Bill Dia is full of himself and crap! He is ignoring real hard evidence to
make himself famous! Just saying the truth !

Author Sunniya LA (5 days)
LAPD totally messed up this case and potentially the real murderer is still
walking about. SMH 

Author star morrison (7 days)
Would you let this man babysit for you?

Author Paul Malale (25 days)
She was gold digger better she die

Author junejunejuniejune (5 months)
Oj had deep AND fresh lacerations on his hands the day after the murders.
Typically when someone is stabbing someone repeatedly, the hand slips and
is cut on the blade. This is just typical forensic facts here. When he was
questioned about the manner in which his hand and fingers had been cut, he
said (verbatim) "I don't know" which would be ridiculous and illogical and
highly suspicious. They investigators were sloppy sure, but that does not
prove OJ's innocence one bit. There are too many holes to account for
"being planted". They surely could not plant lacerations on OJ's hands the
day after the murder.

Author reg profant (17 days)
Once again ron could have had the bruises beforw his death or hit a wall or
anything else the prosecutor could imagine. But they could not cover up the
preservative in the traces of blood they found to frame O.J. people don't
have preservatives in their blood, labs do. So the blood can't be explained
away. Did they even look for bruises on O.J. since it seems they were out
to get him. A high profile case. Besides what ever happened to double
jeopardy. After the first trial found him innocent, he should have not had
the second. How many times do they get to try someone? Till they get the
decision they like.

Author opinionatorX (2 months)
OJ is innocent. The only thing he is guilty of is eating to much.

Author Anddi Heir (6 months)
The video "My brother the serial killer" the man claims he killed them and
has details that sounds like he really did?

Author Gustavo Herrera (14 days)
The private investigator is sooooooooooo sleazy looking!!!! The goatee (or
is it shittee?), the medallion, bracelet and rings!!!!! ha!!!
sooooooooooooo sleazy!!!!!!!! A fucking pinky ring to boot!!!!! 

Author darkrage6 (16 days)
Very interesting, Jason and Simpson's "friend" could've easily committed
the murders.

Author victoria elaine (2 months)
too many theories. too many suspects if you look at this case honestly
possible planted evidence. a older son with a violent history. people in
her drug circle of friends and associates had been murdered in the same
fashion. DNA found under her finger nails that did not match OJ. the
doctor who performed the autopsy did not testify at trail. I heard that the
grand jury did not want to prosecute this case. Vertel was the impounding
company that had the bronco. The tow driver said he did not see any blood
any where. Blood does not appear and then reappear. the timeline does not
even seem plausible.

Author Will Molinar (6 months)
Anyone who thinks OJ didn't do it is ignorant of the facts. And stupid.

Author Andrew Taylor (1 month)
Is it possible OJ was covering for his son?

Author sue she (5 months)
guilty as hell. he got off because he's black.

Author jennifer spicer (23 days)
let's see... two people stabbed and practically decapitated, both dead; and
then, with the discovery of a glove " this now becomes a crime scene."

Author SubliminalOrigami (4 months)
If Simpson was wearing gloves, how did he have nail-gouges on the flesh of
his fingers?
Simpsons room look immaculate, except for the socks, bloodied, left on his
rug? Not tossed in a bin or left in the shoes to dispose of...
Weird case.

Author Karen Duenas (26 days)
Haha, it's funny to me -- seeing so many comments about theories, race
(black, white, etc) ...but my own two cents...
Orenthal James Simpson is GUILTY af
And because he's such an effing douce bag, years later, he landed himself
in prison right where he belongs. 

Author Andre Cherkasov (4 months)
as the white person, there are much more of fagots that are white, sneaky
white fat fucking pigs.than blacks. They whole government is corrupted by
white rednecks. I respect black people as much as anyone else but as you
seen, white pigs cant do their job and thats why the whole U.S. Government
is fucked, inside the U.S. as well in other parts of the worlds military
wise. It will come back to hunt America sooner or later. With love from

Author Jon Jones (1 month)
31:00 do they think were stupid, isnt it possible to have blood on say
the palm of your hand and be bleeding from the back which would explain
leaving 3 blood samples in places like the console while leaving only one
in the door from the bleeding knuckle, who grips a door handle whole
handed, everyone uses a fingertip to knuckle joint to do any more would
leave you open to get your fingers caught. they skew this horribly

Author Anshuk Jain (1 month)
Got some understanding on this case..

The video is pro OJ..

Author Overnity (5 months)
5 Years on?... you mean 20 years on already... '~'

Author beeroosterm (1 month)
Oh, Christ. Really? Fucking Brits are in on the act now? It doesn't matter
any more, assholes. We all know OJ did it no matter what your color. Facts
are colorblind, and the vast majority of the evidence was impeccably
collected and indisputable. It wouldn't matter now if OJ confessed - all
due to Double Jeopardy laws. The reason he doesn't is because his children
would then understand their father was a murderer. The black and left-wing
community would STILL fail to condemn him, for absurd reasons justifiable
only to brainwashed, utopianist assholes. Clearly, the BBC is also run by
such people, or they wouldn't have touched this with a ten-foot pole. Fuck
you, BBC - I used to have respect for your integrity.

Author Mark123321d (1 month)
And the moral of the story some races are stupid

Author adventureboy45 (4 months)

Author Dani Osvaldo (1 month)
You watch the first 10mins, and OJ is guilty, hands down! Watch the next
20mins and he's clearly been set up! I've long hated the police. Every
experience I've ever had was unjustified bordering on extreme aggression in
some cases and everyone I've ever met who's run into the police has also
had bad experiences. At the end of the day, they can only react to
something that has happened. They cannot protect you. Sure, they might
solve the odd case, but compared the ones that get away it doesn't stand to
reason. You & I pay inordinate amount in taxes for a service which doesn't
do as it says on the tin, as it were. The only person that can keep you
safe is you. I have no time for police who's only real job is to revenue
generate for a corrupt government which head-bound on invading counties
illegally to steel, rape & pillage...oh, and of course, kill millions of
innocent people. What, you thought 9/11 was "terrorists"?! That's a great
joke. But even if they were, does that justify the 2 million innocent women
& children alone that have been murdered by US troops in Iraq? Didn't think
so. And be aware, the government has you in mind too. You'll be the final
nail though. Best for last as it were. 

Author jennifer spicer (23 days)
it just occurred to me ! the BBC specializes in bullshit and
misdirection.... how does it feel to be Satan's Bitches.

Author Damaris Whitley (7 months)
Racism came from the White race and everybody already forgot it. Stop
pitying them.

Author Charlie Smith (1 month)
OJ Simpson is innocent of the murders of his wife, Nicole and Ron Goldman.

How do we know? Simple. OJ did not have a bleeding wound on his hand on
his way to Chicago. That means he could not have left the trail of blood
from Bundy to Rockingham. That means that blood was planted. If so, that
means that blood was obtained prior to the murders. If so, that means
there was a conspiracy to use OJ’s own blood to frame him for two murders
he did not commit. Why two murders? Because you need two victims to
assure OJ would face the death penalty. Motives?

Racism: to destroy a successful black man by killing his wife, the mother
of his children, then frame him for the murders. That’s a lot of smoke up
the ass of a Nazi, enough to even cause Hitler to sit up in his grave and
blink twice. But since you need two victims to get “special circumstances”
to invoke the death penalty, another victim was chosen. Another Jew? This
has “Nazi” written all over it.

A second motive would to destroy the credibility of the criminal justice
system which had put two racist cops in prison for beating up Rodney King.
By using DNA evidence it would assure OJ would be convicted and later
executed. Then a tape would come out showing what really happened and
prove the justice system, including the police and prosecutors and even
defense attorneys were not smart enough to catch on to this conspiracy.

A third and likely the most significant reason would be MONEY. The
national scandal that this trial would create, especially if televised
would not only control the attention of the nation for the better part of a
year but would generate billions for all involved. Marcia Clark got a $4
million book deal and many others made millions as well. The money alone
on the heads of OJ, Nicole and Ron would virtually assure their deaths if
this conspiracy was carried out correctly.

WHAT WENT WRONG? The basic plan was simple. Use OJ’s own blood at the
crime scene alone with other personal items from his home to point to him
and only him as the killer. This would be done at a time when OJ had no
alibi for 90 minutes and was home alone. Ron Goldman, who worked nearby
Nicole’s would be manipulated into coming over to Nicole’s. Nicole and
Ron would be killed and the murder scene set up to look like OJ was the
killer. Blood evidence would be spread everywhere and a blood trail
created from Bundy to Rockingham to Chicago by a gaping, bleeding wound
that would be inflicted on OJ while he was drugged in his bed at
Rockingham. When the murder weapon showed up in Chicago along with the
bloody clothes and now-famous Bruno Magli shoes that we know OJ actually
owned, he would be a dead man. His bleeding wound would explain the blood
evidence. However, two critical things went wrong:

The first thing was that while the original plan was simply to leave a pair
of glasses at the restaurant so Ron would have an excuse to drop them off
at Nicole’s, Ron went home and changed clothes instead, before coming over.
Nicole had lit candles, which indicates she was likely going to ask Ron
in. She must have indicated that to Ron in some way when she asked him to
drop off the glasses. He understood what that meant and, of course, wanted
to go home and take a quick shower and change into something more
comfortable in case things really did get romantic; perfectly
understandable. He left the restaurant at 10 minutes until 10 but didn’t
get over to Nicole’s until 10:35 to 10:40 p.m. Had he come straight over
to Nicole’s he would have arrived there by 10 p.m. By going home he
delayed the murders by as much as 40 minutes, which was time enough to
commit the murders before OJ left for Chicago, but not in time enough to
prepare the murder scene properly and get the murder weapon back to
Rockingnam, forcing them to fabricate the time of the murders by their
“plan B”.

“Plan B” was to bang three times on Kato’s wall while he was conveniently
on the phone. Kato would note the time alone with whomever he was on the
phone with so that you had two witnesses to the precise time of the three
bumps. Then, later, the bloody glove from the crime scene. In court the
three bumps would be linked to the glove with the presumption that OJ
dropped the glove there at the time of the three bumps. In the minds of
the jury, this would establish that OJ, indeed, did have time to commit
both murders and get back in time to catch his flight to Chicago. But
when you consider that the bumps on the wall and the planted glove would
have been redundant since the murder weapon showing up in Chicago was a
better confirmation that the murders happened in time for OJ to carry them
out and fly to Chicago, we know that the murders indeed happened later than
planned. The combination of the missing murder weapon, bloody clothes and
Bruno Magli shoes (which all seem to have vanished into thin air in this
case) along with the attempt to create a fake timeline with the planted
glove prove OJ is innocent since the murders were still in progress at a
time when OJ can be confirmed to have been at home.

Of course, the most obvious evidence of OJ’s innocence is the fact that he
did not have a bleeding wound on his way to Chicago, not even needing a
Band-Aid. But OJ did claim he had what amounted to a paper cut before he
left. Thus when he woke up from sleep bleeding profusely, he presumed he
had “reopened” a previous wound. What really occurred is that whoever was
supposed to cut him at Rockingham did not make the wound deep enough to
create a bleeding wound, which was absolutely necessary to explain all the
planted blood everywhere. Likely the conspirators became aware of this
immediately since they probably had planted various individuals at the
airport to ask for autographs and photos so it would show OJ struggling
with a bleeding wound or sporting a large Band-Aid, prompting them to ask
ho w he was injured. OJ might have told them he injured it while playing
golf (knowing OJ), but that’s beside the point. This caused a panic and
to remedy this, he was drugged again in Chicago and this time cut deep
enough to make sure he had a very actively bleeding wound. Ironically,
during the trial, it was that later wound that was seen as responsible for
all the blood drops and the trail of blood and not the non-bleeding wound
he had on his way to Chicago.

The conspiracy worked for the most part since it did generate billions of
dollars and made persons involved with the case rich. Further it was
successful in convincing most of the nation including Oprah that OJ was
guilty. Oprah did several shows later to emphasize how much the fabricated
evidence convinced her of his guilt; she had no clue of a professional
conspiracy to fame an innocent black man for two murders and then have him
executed by the state. The conspiracy failed partly, though, because OJ
was acquitted for other problems with the case. Later in a civil trial,
however, he was found guilty of the murders and sued for millions. He is
now in jail for other reasons not related to the murder case. OJ, clearly
is his own worst enemy many times and was shown to be passionate but to
have a temper and to be abusive. But that’s why he was a good target for
this case. There was recorded evidence of his abuse and so it was easier
to sell him as a murderer.

Now that we know OJ is innocent and that this was a conspiracy, it won’t be
hard to figure out who was involved. The drug used on OJ was the “paper
coma” drug since it is a fine powder that you can place on a small piece of
paper, which when touched, will induce sleepiness and then about an
18-minute coma after the person falls asleep. If OJ and Kato returned to
Rockingham after going to McDonald’s about 9:36 p.m. and OJ has no alibi
from 9:45 to 10:50 essentially, there would have been time to wait for him
to fall asleep and for him to be in a comatose state for 20 minutes say as
late as 10:40 p.m., the precise time the murders were taking place. The
limo driver’s description of OJ’s demeanor, being overheated, is an
indication he had recently been drugged by this specific drug since that is
one of the tell-tale side effects after waking from the drug. This drug
is used for setting up bloody crime scenes but more often used for raping
women while they are in the coma. The use of this drug also shows up in
some subtle references in pop culture media, such as “The Godfather,” which
would link the MAFIA to the use of this drug and possible involvement here.
Where else but to the MAFIA would you go for some professional killers?

Another indication that the blood was planted, of course, is that a
preservative was found in some of the planted blood, proving it had been
collected previously. Obviously, when the gloves didn’t fit OJ in court
that was a huge indication he never wore them. Those who believe OJ is
guilty make up reasons why these gloves didn’t fit in court, but OJ has the
“presumption of innocence” and there would always be reasonable doubt these
particular gloves had previously shrank and that OJ never wore them.

Then, of course, there is the psychological case of OJ vs. the racists.
It is easier to believe a group of racist Nazi cop sympathizers would kill
two Jews and them blame it on a black person than a rich and successful
black man, hoping to get more endorsements, would kill two people.
Further, the money alone connected with a trial of this magnitude was
motive enough. Nicole’s throat was cut so deeply, it nearly decapitated
her. This was interpreted as meaning someone was very, very angry. But
in the context of what we know about the delay in the murders, it may also
indicate that the killer was being rushed and in a hurry to have her bleed
out to more quickly create the crime scene. Also, there were defensive
wounds on Ron Goldman who had training in karate. Why no scratches on OJ
except the one wound on his hand? Out of a reasonable scenario where he
would have received potentially multiple wounds and scratches, he has only
one wound, but that wound was also the only necessary wound. Something is
wrong! Even so, nobody figured it out, even OJ. Finally, the marks on
the body point to a racist cult carrying this out, which is another topic

OJ is not the best black role model in Brentwood, many thinking he is too
“white”, but a father willing to scar his children for life by killing
their mother is a bit of a stretch. 

Author msotil (2 months)
Regardless, even if the woman deserved what came her way, I don't think the
waiter did.
The circumstantial evidence points to OJ as the murder without any room for
doubt in my mind.
And if his not-guilty verdict upsets some people, there have been plenty of
miscarriages of justice in the annals of the judiciary of the USA and no
one makes much fuzz about those.
It is an imperfect system that is often praised by the criminal who gets

Author onstageagain (8 hours)
And you are one dumb fool...your comments prove it...

Embed Video:


Search Video

Top Videos

Top 100 >>>


Analyse website