Videos


Chomsky refutes "libertarian" "anarcho"- capitalism



check it out

Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating
Views: 193,266
Added: 6 years
Runtime: 5:21
Comments: 8127

Tags for this video:  



Find more videos in the: "News"
Uploaded by: mr1001nights
See more videos uploaded by mr1001nights


Related Videos:

Chomsky: "abolishing the state" not a strategy
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 23788
Responding to a question by free-marketeer Roderick Long
Chomsky on Lenin, Trotsky, Socialism & the Soviet Union
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 144017
Q&A session 1989 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUGr5rZSWPo
Chomsky explains anarchism (1 of 5)
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 87289
1976 interview with Peter Jay. 2nd part http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnBnloqzGkE
Chomsky on Leninism 1 of 2
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 48508
Answering someone from the ISO
Dershowitz vs Chomsky debate Israel at Harvard
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 319160
Noam Chomsky on Libertarian Socialism
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 64196
Noam Chomsky visited Motmakt (Counterpower) September 7th, 2011 at Litteraturhuset, Oslo, Norway. Adrien Wilkins speaks with Chomsky about...
Professor Chomsky's Solidarity With Palestine at UN
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 13371
ALSO WATCH https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJh5muRa8zk PRESS CONFERENCE BY CHOMSKY AT THE UNITED NATION.
Interviewer gets fucked by Noam Chomsky
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 710981
Part2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oB1q2tdb-Gw Chomsky talks about the secret US foreign policy .
Anarchism, Libertarian Socialism & Anarcho-Syndicalism (Noam Chomsky)
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 38071
"Anarchism, Libertarian Socialism & Anarcho-Syndicalism: Workers' self-management and Democracy from below". Excerpts from "Conversations with...
Anarcho-capitalism Why it's Broken & How to Fix it
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating
Views: 37518
In this video I'm going to give my analysis of anarcho-capitalism as a belief system. I'm going to point out a number of serious problems that I...
Chomsky on Socialism
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 327408
Noam Chomsky responds to a caller's request for his thoughts on socialism, during a 2003 interview by Brian Lamb, for C-SPAN's "In Depth" program....
Bill Gates: How to Fix Capitalism
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating
Views: 531479
TIME Magazine editor Richard Stengel discusses creative capitalism with Microsoft founder and philanthropist Bill Gates.
(5/5/09) Ron Paul brings out best in Rachel Maddow
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 247406
Ron Paul discusses the GOP with Rachel Maddow 5 5 09
Noam Chomsky Response to Ron Paul at CNN/Tea Party Debate
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 177086
Obama is worse than George Bush and Tony Blair says Noam Chomsky
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 294931
Look at the record, says Chomsky: Obama is in many cases worse than George Bush and Tony Blair -- on Afghanistan, Pakistan, Israel, Egypt -- and...
Chomsky dispels 9/11 conspiracies with sheer logic
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating
Views: 774382
Hat tip to http://onegoodmove.org And yes, I know I'm about to get an avalanche of angry conspiracy theorists commenting on this video.
Chomsky: We Shouldn't Ridicule Tea Party Protesters
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 95503
Instead, those on the Left are to blame for letting right-wing ideologues organize and manipulate them. Noam Chomsky interviewed 2 Dec 2009 by...
Libertarian Vs. Tea Party
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 124063
An average libertarian learns what an average Tea Partier believes. Obviously, this doesn't reflect everyone's views. But it is based on my own...
Noam Chomsky (Oct, 2014) "The Future of the Israel-Palestine Conflict"
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 5409
NEW VIDEO of Prof. Noam Chomsky (Q&A) Date - October 14, 2014
Libertarian vs. Socialist heated debate ensues
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 164172
At a time when the economy is still insecure, why is there an endless debate over capitalism versus socialism and which financial system actually...
Chomsky refutes claims about people wanting wage slavery
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 38406
good stuff
Why Libertarians Are Idiots.
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating
Views: 114621
Dusty Smith explains why Libertarianism is an ideology of suffering and death. I was much nicer than I could have been. I did not even attack the...
Conversations with History: Noam Chomsky
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 417818
On this edition of Conversations with History, UC Berkeley's Harry Kreisler is joined by linguist and political activist Noam Chomsky to discuss...
Noam Chomsky: "Free Markets?"
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 160537
This talk by Noam Chomsky was filmed at Northeastern University, Boston on Dec. 5, 1997
Noam Chomsky on Ron Paul Model of Libertarianism - TestTransmission1984
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 61888
Chomsky discusses the difference between the capitalist right wing libertarianism, practiced by Americans such as Ron Paul, versus it's origins in...

Comments:

Author Johny Diala (3 months)
Libertarians have this nutty delusion that there is some sort of "free
contract" between a potentate and his poor workers. This is largely due to
the fact that they are white, upper-middle class males who have never
endured real poverty. I'd suggest these people try going without food for a
week and see how "free" they are to say no to it once it is offered to
them, even if the person offering them the food is forcing them to do
egregious labour. Capitalism is simply a form of structural coercion; it
exploits the dire situation people are in. It's the farthest thing from
"voluntary"; it's like saying if somone put a gun to your head to try and
mug you, you would be "free" to not give him the money.

Author The Critical G (5 months)
So, according, to Comrade Chomsky, libertarianism means "...power ought to
be given into the hands of private, unaccountable tyrannies..."

When was the last time a Starbucks employee held a gun to your head and
ordered that you buy coffee?

"...even worse than state tyrannies, because there the public has some kind
of rule..."

Excellent, I'm sure that the FDA considers itself very accountable to
citizens who write letters, as do the Federal Reserve, the enforcers of
federal anti-drug laws in States that legalised marijuana, etc.

Why do people listen to this guy?

Author eyeseethroughyou (4 months)
Gotta love all the right wing proprietarians trolling Chomsky videos. Why
aren't you pseudo-intellectuals off watching Molyneux and Schiff videos,
wanking off any time one of them mentions "FREE MARKETS" and "LIBERTY" ?

Author Simon Željko (4 days)
Anarcho-capitalism stands on one false assumption - it assumes that only
states can be the aggressors and only states can abuse their powers and
strong-arm citizens into submission. I don't know what it the basis for
this belief, but I have yet to see an anarcho-capitalist justify it. But
belief in that is greater than any religious belief, greater even than
belief in afterlife of suicide bombers. Chomsky is right, it's
totalitarianism in it's purest. No other ideology is more fundamentally
anti-democratic. Every single libertarian focuses solely on real or
imagined state atrocities, only the power of governments is illegitimate
everything else is perfectly acceptable just because it isn't committed by
the government.

What is incredibly transparent to everybody except anarcho-capitalists (at
least those that actually believe it, not the overwhelming majority of
cynics and sociopaths) is that it's actually based in fundamental rejection
of accountability. Accountability is "violence" for anarcho-capitalists. A
feudalist monarch as a ruler and owner of all land and to some extent even
all the people is perfectly compatible with anarcho-capitalist views. There
were no states back then so it's basically an anarcho-capitalist utopia,
given that they literally don't care about about anything else. Owner has a
right to dispose of his property as he pleases after all. It was only after
the evil revolutionaries stole the land from the owners that the awful
states were founded. These states of course brought accountability, and as
little as that might be or even as feigned, corrupted and imperfect as it
may be, it's universally despised by anarcho-capitalists.

Author Justin Lee (7 months)
But without government who will murder millions of people?

Author Jorg Ancrath (7 months)
Coming from someone who tried to downplay the Cambodian genocide to talk up
the potential for collective farming in the region I am little and less
convinced.

Author Tippersnore (25 days)
Chimpsky Rothabrd/Mises smack-down?

Author exbronco1980 (1 month)
people who live in a pure capitalist nation (libertarian according to the
american definition) would have some choice. they could choose what
products to buy, some people could also choose where they work. one
example, let's say you hate mcdonalds- don't ever go to mcdonalds. example
2, you think movie tickets cost too much- don't go to the movies. i know
sometimes it's really hard to avoid products from a company one might not
like, but usually one has some kind of choice. you don't always have to do
what some corporation wants you to do.

Author Rich Beer (1 month)
Assumptions about libertarians in this thread are among the most laughable
I've read. Statetheism is strong here. Regardless decentralization on a
massive scale is just around the corner. Decentalization of the internet
(ala MaidSafe), decentralization of the marketplace (ala Open Bazzar),
decentralization of currencies (ala cryptocoins), decentralization of
government (ala Sea Steading Institute) ... but who will build the roads?
You are absolutely right, scratch everything I said, we as a species could
never get along without a coercive central planning agency. How foolish of
me.

Author Vuk11 (7 months)
2:40 he is saying unsubsidised capitalism has existed as if that is a claim
that a free market has existed. Africa being the continent with the highest
regulation I don't know how we can say that it's an example of a free
market.

Places like "muh Somalia" were failed states instantly taken over by
warlords. To an Ancap, Statism = Violent Coercive monopoly, which is
exactly what a Warlord it. We do not advocate revolt, as that does leave it
open for Warlords and outside states, we advocate gradual
multi-generational change, towards a more morally based society, one based
on principle and free association. 

Author Michael Giove (6 months)
Chomsky refutes "libertarian" "anarcho"- capitalism

Author 9thchild (7 months)
So because we can't reach perfect liberty (in his opinion), then we
shouldn't even bother to try for more liberty than we have? And because
capitalism can't work without perfect liberty we shouldn't bother with that
either? Very hard to follow his logic. I know he's famous and all, but
sometimes people are just wrong. 

Author To Hell With Our Orders (3 months)
Private, unaccountable tyranny.... sounds more like the NSA than best buy

Author Blake Seener (16 days)
Check out "The state is too dangerous to tolerate" by Robert Higgs.
Organized evil individuals who would otherwise have the same amount of
power and designated authority over anyone else during anarchism, wreacks
the ultimate havoc as they wield state power. Would you rather have
voluntary actions with other individuals and the right to that liberty, or
have a state with a monopoly over violence that steals, kills, and robs
people to maintain its power, get involved and force one group or
individual to preside over another. I would much rather live under a
society where individuals were responsible for their own future, and not
have this factually extremely violent entity get involved claiming to have
some legitimate authority under the guise of keeping everyone safe. 

Author Jm Mac (3 months)
Libertarianism /capitalism is non-stop shape shifting /derailing
/misdirection to break "Socratic Questions" [++]. Specifically Soc Quests
to make them see how capi /libert uniquely creates and defends the
liberalism /feminism it bemoans. [++ Pop-corn trails of questions that try
to get the target to have epiphanies about the error(s) of their thinking.]

And if it dies, most things western culture hold dear will too...

Author Travis Collier (8 months)
This analysis is spot on. In fact the first person to call himself a
libertarian was the anarcho-communist DeJacque who criticized the free
market religion triumphed by a-cap loons. Libertarian ideals in the most
simple sense are the antithesis of authoritarianism.

Author Gufberg (8 months)
Its truely comedic to see half-assed idiots, who can barely type out a
grammatically correct sentence, talk about how "stupid" this guy is or how
"he is just and old man who doesn't know what he is a talking about".
He is one of the most renowned and respected Professors in the world. His
ideas have sent reverberations through the fields of History, Economics,
Philosophy and ofcourse linguistics. He is daily invited to University
Symposiums all across the world ... What about you? What are you doing that
gives you the authority to call this guy an idiot? Get out of here.

Author esmifrado (9 months)
Why is this guy so respected? I never heard him saying anything sensefull
or based in real facts...

Author Brooks Gorden (5 months)
any good videos of real libertarians owning this guy? 

Author Durruti Bielski (7 months)
Do you know where i can read the stuff from chomsky?
Some internet library somewhere?

Author AcePL S. (1 month)
Chomsky is full of it. First example: corporations exist BECAUSE of state.
They feed each other. Same monopoly: unless forced by state, wouldn't exist
for long. Look what robber barons tried without state to back them up:
hired mercenaries, who more often than not were beaten back by ordinary
people.
Also: he can have socialism. But WHY I HAVE TO PAY FOR IT? F**k off!! My
property is mine. What he proposes is robbery. Plain and simple. Another
reason ANYTHING ELSE THAN FREE MARKET is immoral, wrong and simply put
unnatural.
Communism is form of socialism. Don't kid yourself otherwise. Also fascism.
And anything else that demands from one person to give to another, in the
process enriching POLITICIANS AND DECIDENTS.
Chomsky feeds his bullshit because it's politically in demand and he lives
off it.

Author ChasingTruth TakingFlak (5 months)
This is the biggest and most important socialist deception, that
capitalists have distorted language.

Socialists are the true culprits of language confusion, they will tell you
that libertarianism means being the property of your fellow man. They will
tell you that liberty takes the form of mutual societal bondage.

Chomsky is an intelligent man, which is why he's able to pass this bullshit
right under people's noses without them noticing. He turns the expression
of concepts through language into a "he said, she said" pissing contest
about "X" political ideology owning "Y" words.

Author muledunn (5 months)
What a crock of shit, was hoping for something challenging. Libertarian
ideas such as not locking ppl up for smoking weed is tyrannical ? Noam
Chomsky is the dumbest intellectual's intellectual 

Author Eric Schuchman (3 months)
Retard

Author cerealbole (5 months)
This video is just full of ad hominem attacks. He hasn't actually
presented any arguments. Nothing to refute.

As to his claim to be an anarchist...the word "anarchist" comes from the
Greek word anarchos meaning "one without rulers." In other videos he has
described anarcho-syndicalism, proposing "democratic control" of all
institutions in society. He has also proposed forcing everyone to work the
jobs that nobody wants to work. What does "one without rulers" mean to
you? Does it mean that you are free most of the time but not all of the
time? If your peers have the right to vote to force you to dig ditches,
are they not ruling over you in this instance? My understanding of anarchy
is not that I sometimes get the right to rule you and you sometimes get to
rule me depending on how the mob votes. If someone who understands his
philosophy better could please clarify this for me I would greatly
appreciate it. 

Author Israel R (3 months)
propaganda. can't those socialist stop distorting everything?

Author Ian G (3 months)
Fooking commie spook. Time to go bye-bye already, no? Gei in dreard
already!!!

Author Cipher Veri (7 months)
Let me guess, Stefan Molyneux Fanboys flooded the comment section of an
outstanding clip of chomsky refuting Anarcho-Capitalism and proceeded to
demonstrate how little they actually know about the definitions of words.

Author jonas brave (2 months)
I think many of us are talking about MONEY - it has NO intrinsic worth, but
it is an excellent instrument of control (mind control, behavioural
control, attitudes.) We are being played by this game called money. The
slaves need not have chains, if they have a token value substitute they can
attach their mental slavery to.
Money is an instrument of control such that 'your' share can be constantly
hollowed out, devalued and rescinded by the government and industry, and so
arbitrarily - you may think you have a six figure income, but the more you
make the more ways they can effectively cancel it out. As in the former
Soviet Union, there is an attempt to 'make everyone the same' - and poor.
Why? It keeps us playing the game. The difference is in Soviet communism
nobody gave a shit about their job, and WE are motivated to work and
produce value by constantly chasing a false promise of money.
ONLY by constantly taking away what we earn can they keep us running after
it, rarely understanding what a bad deal it is. Then we die - and they
again take 40% away.

Author Why (4 months)
Governments are solely responsible for every evil known to man from the
plastic soup we call oceans to hemorrhoids. In fact, if it wasn't for the
dedicated efforts of the Koch brothers and a plucky band of oil companies
we would all be victims of the U.N. plot to bring the world to it's knees
with a carbon tax and ultimately take our guns away because, let's face it,
American citizens with their guns are the only thing preventing world wide
tyranny.

I just don't understand why Chomsky doesn't realize that the best way to
fix all problems is to allow corporations to do business as they see fit,
unfettered by nefarious concepts like the environment and social justice. I
mean really, what does he know? He's just some guy in youtube videos
whereas I've read Rothbard.

Author Mark V (7 months)
He just says that libertarianism doesn't mean the same thing as it does
elsewhere. I have yet to hear a solid ancap refutation from anyone
anywhere. All you can do is speculate on what the outcome would be from a
purely capitalist society, but that's pretty much it. Anarcho-Capitalist
ideas are theoretical at this point, you can't refute something that has
never been tried.

Author darrellray1964 (9 months)
He is a socialist, plain and simple. Anarchy means no government. As much
as you left-wing nuts like to think socialism is all about the workers
controlling the means of production, it isn't. Socialism will always need
government to force people into slave labor. If you think it is anything
other than that, then you are an idiot. There is no incentive in socialism
and therefore, for socialism to exist, it will need a police state to force
people into it. Because there is no incentive, there will be no innovation
and no economic growth unless people are force to produce. A system like
that isn't sustainable. Most countries today have mixed economies that are
partly state run and capitalism. They will all collapse without
capitalism. The left blame capitalism for things that government have
caused. Think about the housing bubble, that started because of low
interest rates. The low interest rates created speculative investment
which created malinvestment. In a free market, the interest rates would
have been at equilibrium. In a free market, we wouldn't be experiencing
boom and bust markets. In a free market, competition will keep prices
down. Prices go up when government gets involved in markets. And then you
can add inflation. Government creates inflation through monetary policy.
Inflation is getting out of control because government is printing too
much currency to pay for interest on their debt. Therefore, the purchasing
power of the U.S. Dollar diminishes.

Author Urbestestbuddy (10 months)
Libertarian Party is an oxymoron. Libertarianism opposes the initiation of
force and political parties aim to control and participate in a monopoly of
force.

Author To Hell With Our Orders (3 months)
Ok wow so in a video titled "Chomsky refutes "libertarian" "anarcho"-
capitalism" He endorses a quote from Adam Smith "Under conditions of
perfect liberty, markets will lead to perfect equality." First of all let's
forget the word perfect as we are dealing with reality and there are no
"perfect circles" and abstract concepts. If you abolish the state
completely and interactions between individuals could be completely
voluntary (which is about as close to perfect liberty as you can get), that
would lead to the highest level of equality. Chomsky follows by saying, "If
that were possible maybe so." - GREAT! "But it's not in the cards" - Why
not? "oh nevermind the argument probably doesn't work, its fallacious." -
Ok, go ahead and don't show why... and don't explain why your personal
belief of "a free society will never be possible" is more likely than not.

Meanwhile, the assertion that the highest level of liberty possible would
likely lead to the greatest amount of equality possible goes un-refuted.
Thank you, you've done some good work proving the ancap argument in this
video that you probably just named wrong.

Author Kingr Lindorm (4 months)
Chomsky is a boring yet attention seeking idiot who probably would not
survive a day trying to earn a living outside of the failed and highly
corrupted socialist welfare like system of academia today. 

Author Marcus Porcius Cato TheYounger (11 months)
Chomsky is a linguist (SP?) What can he possibly know.
He does not criticise Economics. He criticized some simple minded straw men
and makes up Historical Facts. He does not even understand what Economics
is about. Example:Are you both better off when you trade? If prices go up,
does demand OR quantity demand fall? Ceteris Paribus? Is Aggregate Demand a
real demand curve?
Chomsky is only listened to by college Marxist liberals who want the USA to
be Socialized either in the European sense or the Classical sense. In
short, he is a prophet for Sociology, Anthropology, Pol. Sci…..etc. None of
these are Sciences. If you think the afore mentioned are sciences,tell me
where is their Laboratory were they prove causality. In Economics the
Laboratories are Game theory and Microeconomics Models. Economists laugh at
these Chomsky followers. They are simple not worth the effort to take them
seriously. So why does anyone listen to Him or Zinn or any Humanity or Arts
or Literature Professors? It is baffling ?

Author gaaaaaaaaaaah1 (4 months)
I hate this pretentious person

Author Metaterrestrial (8 months)
Anarcho-capitalist societies would never develop beyond scattered pig
farms. No roads, no internet – just a few unhealthy families living with
their backwards free trade indoctrination. The only question is whether the
government serves special interests or the population, because it's not
going anywhere. Libertarianism or anarcho-capitalism isn't even worth a
debate, a total fantasy. The problem is there's enough propaganda victims
to take it all seriously and support destructive policies that serve the
corps and the elite.

Author TakishidoKamen9193 (6 months)
"Statism": A society dominated by authoritarian, collectivist, bureaucratic
institutions with limited democratic control.
"Libertarianism": A society dominated by authoritarian, collectivist,
bureaucratic institutions with ZERO democratic control.

Author Nick Coons (6 months)
In order to refute something, you have to make arguments. Chomsky made no
arguments in this video, he clarified what he believed historical people
meant when they wrote stuff, and provided conclusion that didn't draw from
those statements. Therefore, he refuted nothing. The title of this video is
misleading.

Author Juan Manuel Correa Caicedo (6 months)
The division of labour leads to so much efficiency that i can get 15 years
of education without working. That's not as stupid and as ignorant for a
human to be. If adam smith said it, adam smith was wrong

Author Alfonso Gutierrez (7 months)
The tenets of anarchism is brutal and wreckless. Anarchism and its
perspective represent a society that has no accountability or
responsibility to its social compact. 

Author Thomas m (7 months)
Ughhh i can't stand chomsky he talks such shiiiiiit 

Author Joey Clavette (9 months)
It cuts off at the good part. Where is the rest?

Author Ben Lee (2 months)
Okay, so he goes right off the bat, proving that he has no concept of what
"capitalism" actually means and gives his own definition to it, which
differs vastly from the definition anarcho-capatalists give it, making his
"refutation" utterly pointless. You also have to be one hell of a wanker to
attack people and movements on the basis of the vocabulary they use,
instead of the ideas they promote. And Chomsky obviously doesn't see beyond
the semantics/verbiage treshold. In an anarcho-capitalist society, "waged
labor", would just be "services exchanged over a period of time, with a
mutually voluntary contract signed by both parties to make sure it remains
mutually beneficial", implying no more hierarchy than there exists between
me and a car salesman when I buy a car from him. It's called free trade.
This doesn't change magically when you trade services instead of products.
It also doesn't magically turn into slavery because the trade lasts over an
agreed period of time instead of a single occurance. I seriously don't know
why people put this man on a pedestal, when his thinking process stops at
mere semantics and vocabulary. Contracted work in an anarcho-capitalist
society would be voluntary, mutually beneficial interaction, not a form of
hierarchy. If I pay an electrician to fix my electricity, I pay him because
I want his services more than I want my money and he performs the services
because he wants my money more than his time. Mutually beneficial win-win
voluntary interaction right there. Now, if the electrician needs a few days
to do this, and we agree to put this in a contract, does it suddenly imply
that either party "owns" the other now? Hell no. The only factors that make
our society fundamentally non-capitalist are government taxation,
regulation and favoratism. It's not capitalism, free trade or a free market
when government enforces monopolies or subsidizes privileges for one
economic player and steals from the rest to do this. The reason why we have
wage slavery is because government steals half your paycheck and makes
labor incredibly expensive for employers, meaning less jobs, meaning a
higher risk when you quit your job and a real possibility that you won't
find any better if you're dissatisfied with your compensation. Government
is a crucial factor in creating the phenomenon of wage slavery. Chomsky
differentiates between government and other forms of social hierarchy as if
they aren't one and the same, as if our current socio-economic problems and
current lifestyles aren't all just symptoms of having government as an
institution. And from the moment that a person denies that the mess we're
in exists BECAUSE we have taxation, overregulation and government
favoratism in the market, that's the moment I lose interest in the
fantasies he comes up with. I would even love to debate him on this if he
could just get rid of the whole "I was born before you and in MY time,
anarchists were more anarchistic than all these youngsters who use words
differently than I do" attitude.

Author version191 (7 months)
he is right libertarian and anarcho capitalists are absolute fucktard
idiots 

Author leGrand Fromage (7 months)
This makes me want to read Adam Smith. His philosophies sound more
complicated than I assumed.

Author zg76 (7 months)
It's too bad Prof. Chomsky has so little and so bad knowledge in Economy.

Author AskaLizzy (8 months)
A rich person or a large company, without government to service it and
protect its monopoly, can't cage you or kill you if you disobey it, and
governments only present the theatre, the appearance, that people get a
voice, that it isn't there to cage and murder those who disobey the one it
really serves, the special interests with pull. When he says "everywhere
else" he means in Marxist dominated countries, where the Frankfurt School
social engineering has mind controlled everyone.

Author Mark V (7 months)
I don't see a refutation here.

Embed Video:

URL 
Link 

Search Video

Top Videos

Top 100 >>>

Videos

Analyse website