Chomsky refutes "libertarian" "anarcho"- capitalism

check it out

Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating
Views: 191,083
Added: 6 years
Runtime: 5:21
Comments: 8057

Tags for this video:  

Find more videos in the: "News"
Uploaded by: mr1001nights
See more videos uploaded by mr1001nights

Related Videos:

Chomsky on market anarchism, Keynesianism & reformism
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 45560
it's about people recognizing the limits of institutions
Chomsky: "abolishing the state" not a strategy
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 23091
Responding to a question by free-marketeer Roderick Long
Chomsky refutes claims about people wanting wage slavery
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 37903
good stuff
Chomsky: Anarchism means choosing your oppression
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 22373
And rejecting markets & their externalities
Dershowitz vs Chomsky debate Israel at Harvard
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 280972
Noam Chomsky "Israel On The Road To Self-Destruction"
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 14045
Students for Justice in Palestine at UCLA is proud to present world renowned linguist, philosopher and activist Noam Chomsky to speak on current...
Noam Chomsky and Glenn Greenwald (2014) "No Place to Hide"
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 6927
Date -- April 15, 2014
Noam Chomsky on "The Federal Reserve" (2013)
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating
Views: 61125
Noam Chomsky on Libertarian Socialism
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 61860
Noam Chomsky visited Motmakt (Counterpower) September 7th, 2011 at Litteraturhuset, Oslo, Norway. Adrien Wilkins speaks with Chomsky about...
Interviewer gets fucked by Noam Chomsky
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 609588
Part2: Chomsky talks about the secret US foreign policy .
Chomsky: We Shouldn't Ridicule Tea Party Protesters
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 93938
Instead, those on the Left are to blame for letting right-wing ideologues organize and manipulate them. Noam Chomsky interviewed 2 Dec 2009 by...
Bill Gates: How to Fix Capitalism
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating
Views: 525830
TIME Magazine editor Richard Stengel discusses creative capitalism with Microsoft founder and philanthropist Bill Gates.
Obama is worse than George Bush and Tony Blair says Noam Chomsky
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 283736
Look at the record, says Chomsky: Obama is in many cases worse than George Bush and Tony Blair -- on Afghanistan, Pakistan, Israel, Egypt -- and...
Ron Paul and the six kinds of libertarianism
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 127599
Too many people define Ron Paul as a libertarian without even understanding what a libertarian is. Here I explain the six most common styles of...
The Most Dangerous Moment In History
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 180619
The most dangerous moment in far...
Libertarian vs. Socialist heated debate ensues
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 159334
At a time when the economy is still insecure, why is there an endless debate over capitalism versus socialism and which financial system actually...
Noam Chomsky on Ron Paul Model of Libertarianism - TestTransmission1984
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 60806
Chomsky discusses the difference between the capitalist right wing libertarianism, practiced by Americans such as Ron Paul, versus it's origins in...
Pat Condell Banned Video
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 115594
william buckley threatens to punch chomsky in the face
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 791371
Date: 1969. Chomsky was a guest on William Buckley's show. This is how guests are treated.
Naomi Klein: Disaster Capitalism
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 330257
Nation columnist Naomi Klein explores a key argument from her new book, The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism: After 9/11 the Bush...
Chomsky: Obama's Imperialist Policies
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 197526
Following a NY Peace Action Benefit viewing of Karen Malpede's new play, Prophesy, Noam Chomsky criticizes Obama's rightwing policies, war making,...
Why Libertarians Are Idiots.
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating
Views: 106400
Dusty Smith explains why Libertarianism is an ideology of suffering and death. I was much nicer than I could have been. I did not even attack the...
Noam Chomsky (2014) "Driving Forces in US Foreign Policy" [NEW!!]
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 28323
Latest NEW Speech and Q&A by Prof. Noam Chomsky Date - May 30, 2014 Chomsky starts at 6:16
Noam Chomsky "Nightmare in Gaza!" [MUST WATCH]
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 8971
"It hardly takes more than a day in Gaza to begin to appreciate what it must be like to try to survive in the world’s largest open-air prison." ~...
Conversations with History: Noam Chomsky
Rating Rating Rating Rating Rating 
Views: 414125
On this edition of Conversations with History, UC Berkeley's Harry Kreisler is joined by linguist and political activist Noam Chomsky to discuss...


Author Johny Diala (1 month)
Libertarians have this nutty delusion that there is some sort of "free
contract" between a potentate and his poor workers. This is largely due to
the fact that they are white, upper-middle class males who have never
endured real poverty. I'd suggest these people try going without food for a
week and see how "free" they are to say no to it once it is offered to
them, even if the person offering them the food is forcing them to do
egregious labour. Capitalism is simply a form of structural coercion; it
exploits the dire situation people are in. It's the farthest thing from
"voluntary"; it's like saying if somone put a gun to your head to try and
mug you, you would be "free" to not give him the money.

Author The Critical G (2 months)
So, according, to Comrade Chomsky, libertarianism means "...power ought to
be given into the hands of private, unaccountable tyrannies..."

When was the last time a Starbucks employee held a gun to your head and
ordered that you buy coffee?

"...even worse than state tyrannies, because there the public has some kind
of rule..."

Excellent, I'm sure that the FDA considers itself very accountable to
citizens who write letters, as do the Federal Reserve, the enforcers of
federal anti-drug laws in States that legalised marijuana, etc.

Why do people listen to this guy?

Author To Hell With Our Orders (1 month)
Private, unaccountable tyranny.... sounds more like the NSA than best buy

Author Jm Mac (25 days)
Libertarianism /capitalism is non-stop shape shifting /derailing
/misdirection to break "Socratic Questions" (to mess up pop-corn trail
reasoning that explains how capi /libert uniquely creates and defends the
liberalism /feminism it bemoans).

And if it dies, most things western culture hold dear will too...

Author gaaaaaaaaaaah1 (2 months)
I hate this pretentious person

Author Justin Lee (5 months)
But without government who will murder millions of people?

Author Jorg Ancrath (5 months)
Coming from someone who tried to downplay the Cambodian genocide to talk up
the potential for collective farming in the region I am little and less

Author eyeseethroughyou (2 months)
Gotta love all the right wing proprietarians trolling Chomsky videos. Why
aren't you pseudo-intellectuals off watching Molyneux and Schiff videos,
wanking off any time one of them mentions "FREE MARKETS" and "LIBERTY" ?

Author To Hell With Our Orders (1 month)
Ok wow so in a video titled "Chomsky refutes "libertarian" "anarcho"-
capitalism" He endorses a quote from Adam Smith "Under conditions of
perfect liberty, markets will lead to perfect equality." First of all let's
forget the word perfect as we are dealing with reality and there are no
"perfect circles" and abstract concepts. If you abolish the state
completely and interactions between individuals could be completely
voluntary (which is about as close to perfect liberty as you can get), that
would lead to the highest level of equality. Chomsky follows by saying, "If
that were possible maybe so." - GREAT! "But it's not in the cards" - Why
not? "oh nevermind the argument probably doesn't work, its fallacious." -
Ok, go ahead and don't show why... and don't explain why your personal
belief of "a free society will never be possible" is more likely than not.

Meanwhile, the assertion that the highest level of liberty possible would
likely lead to the greatest amount of equality possible goes un-refuted.
Thank you, you've done some good work proving the ancap argument in this
video that you probably just named wrong.

Author Vuk11 (4 months)
2:40 he is saying unsubsidised capitalism has existed as if that is a claim
that a free market has existed. Africa being the continent with the highest
regulation I don't know how we can say that it's an example of a free

Places like "muh Somalia" were failed states instantly taken over by
warlords. To an Ancap, Statism = Violent Coercive monopoly, which is
exactly what a Warlord it. We do not advocate revolt, as that does leave it
open for Warlords and outside states, we advocate gradual
multi-generational change, towards a more morally based society, one based
on principle and free association. 

Author Michael Giove (4 months)
Chomsky refutes "libertarian" "anarcho"- capitalism

Author 9thchild (5 months)
So because we can't reach perfect liberty (in his opinion), then we
shouldn't even bother to try for more liberty than we have? And because
capitalism can't work without perfect liberty we shouldn't bother with that
either? Very hard to follow his logic. I know he's famous and all, but
sometimes people are just wrong. 

Author ChasingTruth TakingFlak (3 months)
This is the biggest and most important socialist deception, that
capitalists have distorted language.

Socialists are the true culprits of language confusion, they will tell you
that libertarianism means being the property of your fellow man. They will
tell you that liberty takes the form of mutual societal bondage.

Chomsky is an intelligent man, which is why he's able to pass this bullshit
right under people's noses without them noticing. He turns the expression
of concepts through language into a "he said, she said" pissing contest
about "X" political ideology owning "Y" words.

Author muledunn (3 months)
What a crock of shit, was hoping for something challenging. Libertarian
ideas such as not locking ppl up for smoking weed is tyrannical ? Noam
Chomsky is the dumbest intellectual's intellectual 

Author jonas brave (24 days)
I think many of us are talking about MONEY - it has NO intrinsic worth, but
it is an excellent instrument of control (mind control, behavioural
control, attitudes.) We are being played by this game called money. The
slaves need not have chains, if they have a token value substitute they can
attach their mental slavery to.
Money is an instrument of control such that 'your' share can be constantly
hollowed out, devalued and rescinded by the government and industry, and so
arbitrarily - you may think you have a six figure income, but the more you
make the more ways they can effectively cancel it out. As in the former
Soviet Union, there is an attempt to 'make everyone the same' - and poor.
Why? It keeps us playing the game. The difference is in Soviet communism
nobody gave a shit about their job, and WE are motivated to work and
produce value by constantly chasing a false promise of money.
ONLY by constantly taking away what we earn can they keep us running after
it, rarely understanding what a bad deal it is. Then we die - and they
again take 40% away.

Author Brooks Gorden (3 months)
any good videos of real libertarians owning this guy? 

Author cerealbole (3 months)
This video is just full of ad hominem attacks. He hasn't actually
presented any arguments. Nothing to refute.

As to his claim to be an anarchist...the word "anarchist" comes from the
Greek word anarchos meaning "one without rulers." In other videos he has
described anarcho-syndicalism, proposing "democratic control" of all
institutions in society. He has also proposed forcing everyone to work the
jobs that nobody wants to work. What does "one without rulers" mean to
you? Does it mean that you are free most of the time but not all of the
time? If your peers have the right to vote to force you to dig ditches,
are they not ruling over you in this instance? My understanding of anarchy
is not that I sometimes get the right to rule you and you sometimes get to
rule me depending on how the mob votes. If someone who understands his
philosophy better could please clarify this for me I would greatly
appreciate it. 

Author Travis Collier (6 months)
This analysis is spot on. In fact the first person to call himself a
libertarian was the anarcho-communist DeJacque who criticized the free
market religion triumphed by a-cap loons. Libertarian ideals in the most
simple sense are the antithesis of authoritarianism.

Author serjthereturn (1 month)
the mafia and organised crime are perfect examples of 'anarcho' capitalism
in action

Author esmifrado (6 months)
Why is this guy so respected? I never heard him saying anything sensefull
or based in real facts...

Author wungabunga (1 month)
Chomsky owning you 'freedom!' drones. haha. Loving the shamefaced anger in
the comments section from undergraduate know it alls. 

Author Eric Schuchman (1 month)

Author Israel R (1 month)
propaganda. can't those socialist stop distorting everything?

Author Cipher Veri (5 months)
Let me guess, Stefan Molyneux Fanboys flooded the comment section of an
outstanding clip of chomsky refuting Anarcho-Capitalism and proceeded to
demonstrate how little they actually know about the definitions of words.

Author Durruti Bielski (5 months)
Do you know where i can read the stuff from chomsky?
Some internet library somewhere?

Author Ian G (1 month)
Fooking commie spook. Time to go bye-bye already, no? Gei in dreard

Author Why (1 month)
Governments are solely responsible for every evil known to man from the
plastic soup we call oceans to hemorrhoids. In fact, if it wasn't for the
dedicated efforts of the Koch brothers and a plucky band of oil companies
we would all be victims of the U.N. plot to bring the world to it's knees
with a carbon tax and ultimately take our guns away because, let's face it,
American citizens with their guns are the only thing preventing world wide

I just don't understand why Chomsky doesn't realize that the best way to
fix all problems is to allow corporations to do business as they see fit,
unfettered by nefarious concepts like the environment and social justice. I
mean really, what does he know? He's just some guy in youtube videos
whereas I've read Rothbard.

Author Gufberg (6 months)
Its truely comedic to see half-assed idiots, who can barely type out a
grammatically correct sentence, talk about how "stupid" this guy is or how
"he is just and old man who doesn't know what he is a talking about".
He is one of the most renowned and respected Professors in the world. His
ideas have sent reverberations through the fields of History, Economics,
Philosophy and ofcourse linguistics. He is daily invited to University
Symposiums all across the world ... What about you? What are you doing that
gives you the authority to call this guy an idiot? Get out of here.

Author Mark V (5 months)
He just says that libertarianism doesn't mean the same thing as it does
elsewhere. I have yet to hear a solid ancap refutation from anyone
anywhere. All you can do is speculate on what the outcome would be from a
purely capitalist society, but that's pretty much it. Anarcho-Capitalist
ideas are theoretical at this point, you can't refute something that has
never been tried.

Author Kingr Lindorm (2 months)
Chomsky is a boring yet attention seeking idiot who probably would not
survive a day trying to earn a living outside of the failed and highly
corrupted socialist welfare like system of academia today. 

Author TakishidoKamen9193 (3 months)
"Statism": A society dominated by authoritarian, collectivist, bureaucratic
institutions with limited democratic control.
"Libertarianism": A society dominated by authoritarian, collectivist,
bureaucratic institutions with ZERO democratic control.

Author Nick Coons (4 months)
In order to refute something, you have to make arguments. Chomsky made no
arguments in this video, he clarified what he believed historical people
meant when they wrote stuff, and provided conclusion that didn't draw from
those statements. Therefore, he refuted nothing. The title of this video is

Author Juan Manuel Correa Caicedo (4 months)
The division of labour leads to so much efficiency that i can get 15 years
of education without working. That's not as stupid and as ignorant for a
human to be. If adam smith said it, adam smith was wrong

Author version191 (4 months)
he is right libertarian and anarcho capitalists are absolute fucktard

Author Thomas m (4 months)
Ughhh i can't stand chomsky he talks such shiiiiiit 

Author Alfonso Gutierrez (4 months)
The tenets of anarchism is brutal and wreckless. Anarchism and its
perspective represent a society that has no accountability or
responsibility to its social compact. 

Author Urbestestbuddy (8 months)
Libertarian Party is an oxymoron. Libertarianism opposes the initiation of
force and political parties aim to control and participate in a monopoly of

Author leGrand Fromage (5 months)
This makes me want to read Adam Smith. His philosophies sound more
complicated than I assumed.

Author Rich Beer (5 months)
Chomsky is brilliant on many levels but is not all knowing. He has ideas,
some good, some great and others maybe neither but at least he has ideas
that provoke others to question their own beliefs. Whether you agree with
the viability of anarcho-capitalism or not, it is worth looking at if only
because it is becoming increasingly popular with a subculture of highly
intelligent youth.

Author zg76 (5 months)
It's too bad Prof. Chomsky has so little and so bad knowledge in Economy.

Author themi90 (5 months)
Adam Smith hated capitalism?

Author AskaLizzy (6 months)
A rich person or a large company, without government to service it and
protect its monopoly, can't cage you or kill you if you disobey it, and
governments only present the theatre, the appearance, that people get a
voice, that it isn't there to cage and murder those who disobey the one it
really serves, the special interests with pull. When he says "everywhere
else" he means in Marxist dominated countries, where the Frankfurt School
social engineering has mind controlled everyone.

Author 70matusz (6 months)
Nice title of the video, but highly deceptive.... he doesn't say anything
to refute anarcho-capitalism. He just says that words have changed
meaning.... yes that is what words do over time. 

Author Marcus Porcius Cato TheYounger (9 months)
Chomsky is a linguist (SP?) What can he possibly know.
He does not criticise Economics. He criticized some simple minded straw men
and makes up Historical Facts. He does not even understand what Economics
is about. Example:Are you both better off when you trade? If prices go up,
does demand OR quantity demand fall? Ceteris Paribus? Is Aggregate Demand a
real demand curve?
Chomsky is only listened to by college Marxist liberals who want the USA to
be Socialized either in the European sense or the Classical sense. In
short, he is a prophet for Sociology, Anthropology, Pol. Sci…..etc. None of
these are Sciences. If you think the afore mentioned are sciences,tell me
where is their Laboratory were they prove causality. In Economics the
Laboratories are Game theory and Microeconomics Models. Economists laugh at
these Chomsky followers. They are simple not worth the effort to take them
seriously. So why does anyone listen to Him or Zinn or any Humanity or Arts
or Literature Professors? It is baffling ?

Author Mark V (5 months)
I don't see a refutation here.

Author Alfonso Gutierrez (5 months)
Libertarianism is full of shit...its premises are simply delusional and
idiotic like their gods Ayn Rand, Adam Smith and the worst of these clowns,
the crazed old man Ron Paul.

Author Tsadi9Mem9Khet9 (6 months)
Those who believe in attempting to bring about equality do not believe in

Collectivism is totally idiotic and to give an example, its proponents
simultaneously claim that bringing about a collectivist system is justified
because the "proletariat" have been wrongly treated by the "bourgeoisie",
and that collectivists are justified in seeking to establish totally amoral
and immoral equality because there is no such thing as wrong.

Author Metaterrestrial (6 months)
Anarcho-capitalist societies would never develop beyond scattered pig
farms. No roads, no internet – just a few unhealthy families living with
their backwards free trade indoctrination. The only question is whether the
government serves special interests or the population, because it's not
going anywhere. Libertarianism or anarcho-capitalism isn't even worth a
debate, a total fantasy. The problem is there's enough propaganda victims
to take it all seriously and support destructive policies that serve the
corps and the elite.

Author Edward Welsch (6 months)
Chomsky is totally confusing and distorting what libertarianism means and
its history. This is a short definition, and it applies no matter the
location or time period: In a free society, we own our selves and our
property and we have the equal opportunity to exercise rights over those.
This is the "perfect equality" of rights. What it doesn't include, and is
the source of Chomsky's confusion, is equality of outcomes. We our selves
differ just as our property differs, and our outcomes differ as a result.

What people in free societies don't have a right to do is to take another
person's rights away in order to make outcomes more "fair," which is what
Chomsky is advocating. Free societies don't aggress on personal rights in
the name of making outcomes equal. Certainly the current societies in the
U.S. and Western Europe fall short of being completely free by this
definition, but they are an improvement upon the past.

Chomsky calls this free system of equal rights and inequal outcomes
"extreme tyranny." That does an injustice to the reality of real tyrannies
that existed for most of human history, and is ignorant of the history of
human deprivation that plagued the communist societies that tried to
guarantee the equality of outcomes that he advocates.

People should remember that Chomsky's expertise and brilliance is in the
field of linguistics. Unfortunately he's used his well deserved success in
that field as a platform to pronounce on politics and economics, where not
only is he not qualified, but he's barely coherent.

Author Anes Kurtovic (7 months)
John Doe Jr. go play some moron games...

Embed Video:


Search Video

Top Videos

Top 100 >>>


Analyse website