Videos


Why Do So Many People Mistake Me for a Conservative?



Realizing Trump would win the election, and isn't a one dimensional villain, does not mean I am anywhere on the right, as understood by most people on the right.
Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/Styxhexenhammer666
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Styx666Official
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Styxhexenhammer666Official/
Second video channel on vidme: https://vid.me/Styxhexenhammer666


Views: 33562
Added:
Runtime: 15:55
Comments: 846

Tags for this video:



Find more videos in the: "25"
Uploaded by:
See more videos uploaded by


Comments:

Author David Stroud ( ago)
Today's left is now so left that anything on the right is instantly considered conservative.

Author keithrig ( ago)
I always thought Styx was a Libertarian.

Author ThriveOnHavoc ( ago)
Welcome to the post-modern world y'all.

Author Platerpus7 ( ago)
Here's your answer. Because you're not constantly attacking Trump.

Author RealityFacade ( ago)
You're a disturbed confused individual. Which is unfortunate, because you seem quite smart. Some of what you're saying is true but some is pure absurdity. I hope you do some more thinking and figure out reality.

Author Orion Feldspar ( ago)
1776 WORLDWIDE

I'm telling Alex Jones you've said this, get ready for infowars fame, pal

Author Rafiq Jennings ( ago)
Damn, I wish I knew about your channel before I jumped on the caboose of the Trump train :(

Author LucisFerre1 ( ago)
I'm an Ayn Rand Objectivist who dabbles in the occult. Figure THAT ONE out.

Author Pythia's Daughter ( ago)
I loathe the Left and the Right, both are narrow dogmatic dullards. We have devolved into tribes mindlessly attacking each other and turning our political elections into some fucking game. The left are smug and delusional and the Right are aggressively ignorance and bigoted. Thank you for pointing out that every Trump fuck-up is not 4-D chess.

Author Joseph Flammens ( ago)
Describing my views is pretty difficult. I sometimes call myself fascist, but I'm not like the old fascists and some of the larpers. For example, I have no problem with homosexuality, I don't mind women having jobs (even though I do think traditional gender roles are superior), I don't want to ban or even regulate porn*, I'm generally opposed to the death penalty or even life imprisonment for what I call "civilian crimes**, and I would legalize all drugs. I call myself a fascist because I'm very nationalistic, imperialistic, believe in racial reality (I want to preserve the white race and think that westerners and East Asians should actually rule the world), and because my general philosophy towards governance is utilitarian (do what is best for the nation). I do believe the state has a role in shaping culture and society, that it should be able to propagandize, and that it should do things to improve society, rather than just letting it become a cesspit of debauchery, lawlessness, and degeneracy***. I would support things like eugenics (in the sense of controlling who gets to breed, not necessarily in the sense of euthanizing people) and think that while the state shouldn't persecute homosexuals and trans people, it should value heterosexuality above those other sexualities given their role in society.

I also am not 100% free market, but also not entirely socialist. I'm middle of the road on economics too, believing that while the market is generally better off on its own, there may be times when it is in the national interest to intervene.

Basically, I'm a new type of fascist, uncorrupted by Christian dogma the way that the old ones were. I want a true return to the spirit of the west, a pagan spirit that was very different from that of Christian Europe. Did the pagans care about gayness? Did they care about the trans? Did they give a damn about pornography (yes, they had it too, just not in photography)? Did they usually care to regulate the sex lives of citizens or control what drugs and drink they could consume? No, at least not generally. Yeah, there was some censorship, to be sure (Christianity was, at one time, illegal. It's just too bad the Romans failed to destroy that religion). I'm more liberal than today's conservatives, but more conservative than today's liberals. I'm more traditional (forget going back to Christian morality. I want to go back to Greco-Roman pagan moral norms, for the most part) than the fascist traditionalists of the 30's and 40's, but am also quite aware that those systems were imperfect and could have been improved (getting rid of slavery, for example). I'm racially aware, but I'm neither cucked nor a supremacist who wants to kill all non-whites (I think the west should be dominant, but there is room in the Reich for talented, intelligent, westernized non-whites). I love the white race and want us to flourish, but I do not hate any other race (no, not even (((((them))))). I recognize the JQ as legitimate, but not all Jews are the enemy. There are a lot of them who are, but there are also a lot of them who we need not hate). In fact, I appreciate some of the beautiful elements of other races (black men can be profoundly smooth and talented in the arts, for example, in a way that is unique and different from whites).

I don't hate authority, I just care how it is used, and find some laws to be unnecessary and even detrimental. Take building codes, for example. Why is it that in some places it is illegal to build yourself a tiny house to live in on your own land? Why is it that certain types of buildings, on one's own land, are illegal, even if they're constructed in a perfectly safe manner? Why should I need to ask permission to build myself a home? How does this help society? I don't believe it does. I believe it, in fact, hinders society and takes away the beauty and creativity that could be out there. Sure, not everyone will like everything that is built, but who cares? Why does the state need to use its power to enforce someone else's preferences?

*(I would legalize all forms of pornography for viewing, even the worst sort of filth, and the only time making porn would be illegal is when children, the mentally infirm, or animals are being harmed or abused, or some other law is being broken, in which case the government would encourage people in the public to spread the video or picture in the hopes of getting help from the public to identify the people depicted so we can arrest them, try them, and send them to decades of suffering in prison upon conviction. The footage would then be used at trial to convict the perpetrator. Who cares if some pervert waxes his carrot or roughs up their clam to footage of abuse. They're not actually causing the person to be abused. Besides, footage of far worse crimes is perfectly legal. If I wanted, I could easily google videos of ISIS executions where people are drowned in acid, burned alive, or stoned to death, and unless there is reason to believe I were an ISIS supporter, I probably wouldn't get a knock on the door from the police or the FBI.)

**(a civilian crime is any crime that is not 1. committed by a foreign national in our country against a citizen, 2. large in scale so as to be conceived of as an act of war against the people or the nation, 3. seditious in nature (large scale rioting and things like blocking roads should be treated like an insurrection and dealt with extremely harshly due to the danger they pose to public order and public safety. If any citizen dies as a result of these actions, I think the death penalty should be on the table for everyone proved to be involved, but especially the organizers. I'll bet you riots would be less likely to happen if there were these sorts of consequences to it), 4. outright treason, or 5. being in a high position in a large scale criminal enterprise. (I would execute gang leaders just for being gang leaders, and possibly their underlings depending on the crime and their willingness to leave the gang and spill the beans on its secrets) For civilian crimes, the maximum sentence you should be able to get is 20 years with an indefinite sentence beyond that. No one should be sent away for life at trial for a civilian crime. Most people can be reformed, and the ones that can't need only be secured away from society until they are no longer a threat. Some of them may even need treatment for mental health issues. But those who commit the five categories of crimes listed above cease to be civilians in my book. They can be treated as enemies of the state and subject to significantly harsher punishment, including public execution (not just the nice ones either. Some crimes warrant miserable deaths), life imprisonment at hard labor with no chance of parole, forfeiture of all property to the state (with, perhaps, a small exception made for their offspring, as it would be wrong to punish their children for the crimes of their parents), and even possibly mutilation or torture of some sort to make an example of them (blinding, cutting off limbs, etc.). Essentially, once you get convicted of one of these crimes against the nation, you're fucked in every conceivable way and will be shown little to no mercy.

*** Degeneracy, to me, does not mean being a sexual weirdo, a drinker, or a user of drugs. It doesn't mean being flamboyantly gay like Milo, or dressing up as a woman when you're a man. It doesn't even mean being a slut or a whore. Being a degenerate, at its core, simply means a lack of civic and prudential responsibility, a lack of respect or care about your fellow citizens or about society at large. It means not providing anything of worth to society and, perhaps, even providing negative utility. A criminal is a degenerate. An alcoholic is a degenerate. A drug addict is a degenerate. A person who has fifty kids with thirty different men and is living on welfare and not taking care of her kids is a degenerate slut and the men who don't take care of their kids and knocked her up in the first place are degenerate deadbeat losers. A gay man providing comedic entertainment by being over the top and sassy who is fighting back against degeneracy and leftist cuckery is not a degenerate. He's just different, and he is in fact helpful to society.

Author Sam Hyde ( ago)
Probaby because you blab above your proverbial pay-grade when it comes to politics. protip: Molyneux/Mises is babbys first political theory. Most grow out of that garbage in their early 20s

Author ReplacedByDrumbot ( ago)
Dude, I'm sorry I know this is irrelevant, but have you ever considered that you might have been Mike Judge's inspiration for Gilfoyle in Silicon Valley? Cus you two look similar, talk similarly, he's a vocal satanist, very matter of fact like yourself, and I totally buy that Mike Judge could have gotten deep enough into youtube to find your stuff before/during the development of that show, have you watched that show? It's guuuuuuuud.

Author Rodney Terry ( ago)
To this day i have no freaking clue what alt-right actually means.

Author Ian Warren ( ago)
It's the way you dress.

Author Ceasius ( ago)
Can anyone tell me what the eagle in the background means? Is it Roman?

Author Cheryl ( ago)
If you like funny,, go watch Gavin McInnes break it down.

Author SkyNet ( ago)
You are an intellectual

Author SkyNet ( ago)
I don't

Author john kelso ( ago)
You have made it clear from when I first started listening to you in sept to oct. that you were libertarian. If anyone accuses you otherwise then they have not watched much. There is much I disagree with you on from spiritual perspectives to some political positions but you have always been consistent in your reasoning. This is why I trust your channel.

Author Greg Maland ( ago)
I find your videos intelligent, thoughtful and original. But here, while you say how little all these "labels" mean at this point (and I agree), you keep using them. It would be helpful if you, without resorting to labels, simply described your views on the proper role of government. You do this to some extent at the end of the video, so I appreciate that.

Author Chabot ( ago)
You should talk about jews. Good timing since some people think this syria shit is connected to them.
Edit: Never mind, you touched on it a little.

Author ricky ( ago)
styx you are such a badass

Author Ro500501502 ( ago)
Paleo-Conservatism is the only one that makes any sense. It seems necessary in our time to go back to that.

Author Facts vs. Feelings ( ago)
Corrupt language corrupts thoughts corrupts reality. This is why I never engage in meaningful dialogue with anyone without getting them to define racism, sexism, feminism, equality, or whatever topic we're about to talk about. Then I let them know our definitions differ and it'd be a waste of time for us to continue and walk away. To do so otherwise would be like critiquing the film Pulp Fiction when the other person is thinking of Ben-Hur, hears "Ben-Hur" instead of "Pulp Fiction", and says "Pulp Fiction" instead of "Ben-Hur".

Ideally, literally nothing would be censored. People wouldn't be dumb enough kill people at the behest of others nor could they be intellectually dishonest enough to use it as an excuse to kill, and everyone would be smart enough to reserve judgment on every piece of information they come across, whether it's a supposed fact stated by a respected scientist or the most outrageous slander from word of mouth.

Author Wyatt K ( ago)
One thing I know for sure is that one would think that someone growing up in New England would be a big time liberal. I think you somehow missed liberal indoctrination in the schools. I wonder how you escaped it. There is no question that you are an independent thinker. I think you are more into common sense than a particular ideology. I do think conservatism is far more rooted in common sense than liberalism. This is because conservatives tend to look at the world as it is rather than how it should be. A liberal will love a slogan like "Peace." A conservative, on the other hand, would recognize that while peace is a nice idea, mankind has been fighting since the dawn of time and likely will never stop. us, conservatives arrive at peace through strength because they think war is so likely only strength will avoid it. In any event, I see you more common sense. I am not sure I like the image you present sometimes, but I have to acknowledge that you do have some common sense views on contemporary issues.

Author Rose Ciulla ( ago)
You must sit back and chuckle at the silly minions and mortals as plentiful as ants now or roaches, on a daily basis. Better then comedy shows, aye, or even a good trip... Amazing how stupid people are, thus their craving for labels. After all, maneuvering through life with clear analysis, critical thinking i.e.reason or actual logic is far too much work... Slap a label on so the easy task of judgement can commence... LOl
I am surprised no one has thought of barcode tats, right!!! Tehehe...

Author Lara Fabans ( ago)
It's like you're George Washington who cautioned against political parties and said to focus on the issues....I wonder if it's too late for that.

Author The Great Cornholio ( ago)
*Styx move to Vietnam.*

Author Fuzzy Cakes ( ago)
I love your videos but i hate how you end all of them so abruptly. It always seems like you've got a nice flow going and then there's a "that's about all" out of nowhere and it's really jarring. Maybe try to end more naturally? Much love bro.

Author Michael Derenger ( ago)
The shot at Brother Nathanael I think was unnecessary. Implying hes insane? He covers facts often straight from the horses mouth.

Author Best Ever ( ago)
I had to go to the uban dictionary 6 times watching this. whew!

Author pato milbert ( ago)
A democrat is a cultural Marxist in my eyes. A republican can be many things, a cuck, a crypto democrat or a Mark levin or a Sean Hannity gate keeper for Israel types. Both parties are bought by the same big money.

Author tehkoalainsurgency ( ago)
Classical Liberalism is sort of like a default position of a Westerner who believes in Western values. Progressives are not allies of Liberals, they want to take things in a different direction; more authoritative and marked by a rejection of established structures of Western society. They have pushed the spectrum so far to the Left, that moderate and/or classical Liberals now seem they are standing on the Right side of the aisle. This is why they confuse you for a Conservative.

Author Vlad Enache ( ago)
OY VEY

Author lowaces ( ago)
i thought people would call you a hippy, nyuk nyuk nyuk

Author docgonzales ( ago)
Because you believe the free market is the cure for all the worlds ills? You favour the govt green lighting isp's being able to sell your search history to private companies, enough said. Oh, and the 10,000 straw man army you have to argue against the left, every fucking video, is a big hint.

Author Shaka Zulu ( ago)
Maybe cause you're a Trump shill.

Author The Roh ( ago)
Look up Hoppean Libertarianism. Libertarianism with Physical Removal.

Author The Midnight Chimera ( ago)
I am very thankful that I found your channel. It is remarkable how similar we are in terms of logical analysis and political affiliation. Thank you for the continued, and regular, thoughtful commentary.

Author Dave Arroyo ( ago)
I did describe you as a liberal when I shared one of your videos on Facebook. I figured if I tried to describe you as anything else the people I hoped would watch it wouldn't want to.

Author Yggdrasil ( ago)
Can you explain how western countries can extricate themselves from what seems to be increasingly unsustainable regimes that force policies on populations that have had demonstrably detrimental short-term effects (e.g. mass immigration)? Does your answer give you an indication of your basic values and political positions?

Do you think at some point (let's say in 100 years) people such as Europeans will have to start thinking practically, those people who no longer have the luxury of being noncommittal? Is it possible that human society is largely cyclical, that our human nature is largely intractable due to our corporeal existence, and that at some point practical necessity dictates action even for those whose preference is procrastination, prevarication or apathy?

All the labels are very interesting, but assuming that western societies are getting worse and not better, then perhaps when one's health, welfare, values, way of life or even survival are at stake they may be able to tolerate being called names they dislike? It feels as though many thinking people are working their way, albeit slowly and falteringly, toward one of very few viable solutions as to how to deal with the real underlying root cause problems which will only become more severe over time.

Author Lorri Lewis ( ago)
Too many people want simple labels because it saves them from having to think. They don't get political atheists who evaluate each policy on it's own merits.

Author Palmer White ( ago)
Jesus fucking Christ. This shit is becoming just like the god damn SJWs with 100 genders or pronouns! You're either democrat or republican! Don't gimme the neo this or libertarian that. Fucks sake! You're either a liberal lunatic or a republican! End of story!

Author stevenjlawson ( ago)
oh...I thought you was a Bernie Bro...

Author Kveldsmat ( ago)
Any national socialist stirnerite egoists here?

Author Alex King ( ago)
Glad you made this. I like you Styx but a lot of people following this channel are fake Nazis who need a life and a better father figure lol

Author Ritean Dan ( ago)
I think the term "alt-right" went through several incarnations before it was somehow settled on what everyone seems to all agree with what it now means. When I first heard it, that's what I thought I was. (Btw, Gavin McInnes did a video just today on "what is the alt-right?"). I didn't really fit Liberal, and I cannot go through the checklist of Conservative either without swaying Left on certain issues. When I listen to people like Crowder & Shapiro, both who never had sex before marriage, seemed to not date much (or at all!?), during high school, and now get preachy about being pro-life, even in cases of incest and rape, I can't stand behind that in any way. I've also come to terms with the fact that I am a Classical Liberal, which, Rubin claims he is also (and when Shapiro was on his show, he agreed he was as well!?). I've checked out Blaire White who is a transsexual conservative and absolutely hated by Leftists. In all, it's become so confusing. I just know come 2019, Justin Trudeau will more than likely be out of office. There won't be much choice other than to vote Conservative and just roll with all of the social funding & programs slashed once again for the disabled which affects me personally. At least we can maybe take back CANADA before it gets as bad as Sweden.

Author Dan Lopez ( ago)
I've taken to calling myself a Jeffersonian. The Libertarian Party destroyed the libertarian label with Gary Johnson, unfortunately

Author Patrick Meredith ( ago)
tbf, I think most of the leftists are just useful idiots that don't understand that they are creating newspeak to suit someone else's motives (the big government people like Soros)

Author KDJT ( ago)
Easy: they mistake you for a conservative because you know the difference between right and wrong.

Author 5burowz ( ago)
#Retarded

Author Mike ( ago)
Honest thoughts on pjw?

Author ZERO COOL ( ago)
i thought you just called out bullshit. that goes for both sides.

Author Khorvin Veneer ( ago)
Labels, while expedient, when used singularly, usually cannot exclusively encapsulate identity. They often lead to confusion and are a means to reinforce a group mentality, which leads to ingroup/outgroup biases.

Author TheGnarlyDoug ( ago)
You're right, these labels often hinder more than they help. I believe in the non-aggression principle as the best baseline for personal and political morality absent exigent circumstances. That is the type of 'libertarian' I am, but just saying I'm 'libertarian' or 'anarchist' confuses more than it clarifies many times.

Author Bottlekiller ( ago)
1:23
Reality check: You can have free speech AND a fucked up non-functioning political landscape at the same time.
No need to get salty dude, it's just what it is.

Author james jones ( ago)
styx comes off as a apologist

Author M kusanagi ( ago)
corporal radar of "MASH" more like, no? :0 ~~ 😎 -msi

Author Joelthedon22 ( ago)
"bernie bros" are nazis - Styx

lmfaooo this dude needs help

Author Second Coming Of Bast ( ago)
Probably because you're an independent thinker not bound to any hardcore ideology, whereas most liberals are leftist shills.

Author David Robinson ( ago)
Sorry but europe has significantly better freedom of speech laws compared to the US. They are known as Human Rights and are not a new concept that gets shoved down our throats every time someone wants to make a political point like in the failed American constitutional system. We don't brag about about freedom of speech everytime we get a boner because we don't have to. It's like healthcare, it's absolutely free over here and no one makes a big deal about it - THE WAY ALL CIVIL RIGHT MATTERS SHOULD BE.

Author mit mumo ( ago)
YOU REMIND ME OF A CHICKEN.

Author Ariane Kosmolowski ( ago)
@Styxhexenhammer666:

Let me put it this way: In a deeply unreasonable society, resonable people just have no drawer to fit in. Except for the one labeled "reasonable people".

Author Anthony Caputa ( ago)
O used to consider myself a Libertarian who didnt believe in Open borders. But at somepoint between 2012 and now they bevame overrun with modern liberals who at least lean SJW. Ill stick with classical liberal.

Author OnEiNsAnEmOtHeRfUcKa ( ago)
Because you actually make sense most of the time.
There you go, mystery solved.

Author Sly Goat ( ago)
You're a right-winger. Libertarianism is right-wing. People think right-wing just means conservative, even though conservativism has little to do with economics at this point other than the idea that we should all embrace corporatism.

Author eric vulgate ( ago)
on the words point-
the various 'phobia' accusations bother me as well.
just because someone doesn't support, or doesn't like something doesn't mean they're afraid of it.
and everybody knows this. but they keep using the words.
it's a purposeful misuse of language in order to control the dialog.

Author eric vulgate ( ago)
on the islam point-
there are plenty of moderate muslims, but no moderate islam.

Author B Hobbs ( ago)
Stop living in denial. You are very conservative leaning libertarian.

Author Auceza ( ago)
None is really an absolute conservative. Life goes on.
But some ideas of the past are good. Not everything that's trendy is good.

Author Farmeraap ( ago)
No freedom of speech in Europe?

Article 7:
1. None need approval to publicize thoughts or opinions through press or other media.
2. There may be no prior limitations withholding one from publicizing through radio or television.
3. No one shall be required to submit thoughts or opinions for prior approval in order to disseminate them by means other than those mentioned in the preceding paragraphs, without prejudice to the responsibility of every person under the law. The holding of performances open to persons younger than sixteen years of age may be regulated by Act of Parliament in order to protect good morals.

This article completely rules out the act of censorship in the Netherlands.

Author Jason Strom ( ago)
I never used the word Cuck in regards to politics(at least not in regards to what you say) I mostly used it to label a homo who's led around by his women hooking his foreskin as she fucks his best friend... lol! Most of the time that can be pasted onto those who try and speak on politics and then their girl steps up to shuts them up for it not being her similar feminazi narrative, hence they then become a Cuck...😂 Because they're letting their woman wear the jeans and can't speak for themselves, but I never took it to be meaning Cuckservative. As a matter of fact the way I use it it seems more trended to the Left than the Right.

Author Andrew Johns ( ago)
Just don't use labels.

Author I Frames ( ago)
On point as usual

Author AL GIZ ( ago)
You can't believe in Capitalism and the monetary system and at the same time be against wars. It doesn't make any sense. If you play a game, you have to accept all the rules of the game.

Author Cos Its 167 ( ago)
Christ. I just realised I felt unable to turn to any commenter to make sense of this Syria strike bullshit, then I saw you in my feed and thought "Oh yeah, that guy, he seems sensible." And sure enough, with this video, you've cemented that opinion.

It's amazing how badly traditional media have shit the bed that I turn 40 and consume little but youtube commentary to get my facts (hopefully). Thanks for being sane and informed enough to hold my interest.

Author Gonza ( ago)
Should we start the Muslim question?

Author Kingfloppynip The 3rd ( ago)
because you say shit that ppl don't like

Author killmodecapitalism ( ago)
It's like the "latin X" narrative. Latin languages Identify gender xD

Author Tomato Man ( ago)
Hey, you prove you are not conservative by wearing rainbows and a g-string and promoting NAMBLA.

Author Disaffected Left ( ago)
You may think Leftists are inventing all these terms to control language and thus outlook but that's just your "power + privilege" speaking :P

Author Oliver Cromwell ( ago)
my politics and faith is so broad views are hard to define as well i don't really agree 100% with any one philosophy that is out there liberals think im a hardline Conservative and Conservatives think im a liberal i would say im a sane person love your channel and show.

Author Al Wake ( ago)
I just think of you as a good ol dude!

Author MEGA ( ago)
Styxism

Author Gareth Browne ( ago)
So many people call you conservative because it seems 'conservatives' are the only ones who still have functioning brains anymore, so naturally they make the assumption you are a conservative because you have the ability to think for yourself.

Author Hardcase726 on Gaming and Politics ( ago)
What's the difference between liberals and libertarians? Simple liberals are the SJW's and libertarians is now more right or "Alt centered"

Author PeterFied FM ( ago)
Im not on any side, only for FREE WILL, its really easy. ACTUAL BODILY HARM TO OTHERS is the LINE, its a concept women do not get and alot of men can't get for some reason. I dont know why.

Author Gotthatgoin4me ( ago)
because you're are articulate and intelligent

Author FallenOnDryTinder ( ago)
(((Styx Kikenheimer )))

Jk, luv u bruh

Author Donn Harper ( ago)
Heinlein libertarian.....The term I use....Styx sounds often like Lazarus Long, and I mean that completely complimentary! maybe Heinlein minarchist....
with clear understanding of cultural Jungian Psychology....

Author FallenOnDryTinder ( ago)
Alt-Right = White Ethno-Nationalism. This is not a question.

Author Allan ( ago)
Governments just like pushing everyone around regardless of what they call themselves.

Author Blake ( ago)
being conservative today, doesn't mean what it used to mean.. conservatives across the board aren't monolithic... for example I hate the spreading Islamisation and mass muslim migration in our civilisation,,, that is a conservative stance. however I'm comfortable with gay marriage which is a more liberal stance. I still call myself an overall Conservative because nothing matters to me more than the Islam problem

Author Blake ( ago)
the right is nothing to be ashamed of.

Author Donatellangelo ( ago)
I don't think you are a conservative, I think that you are a cat. ( ⓛ ω ⓛ *)

Author Chunk Ogre of The Cucked Turks ( ago)
Who wants to bang my girlfriend Ana while I watch? She just had a nose job recently and lost around 80 lbs...

Author pigletjt ( ago)
common sense will always befuddle the new left, it's beyond their comprehension...

Author Zack Z ( ago)
Classic liberals never cared about immigration, or corporations working together with governments to fuck everything up. Why people try to bring back this dated label with a different meaning? A "classic liberal" would allow George Soros to shit all over his country. Also, the alt-right is not the right fam. Collectivism, identity politics, marxist class struggle bullshit adapted to race struggle with the jews playing the bourgeoisie and conspiracy theories from 50 years ago is not right-wing. And it's certainly not a political movement with relevance to the political landscape, no more than the stormfront ever was anyway. It's just an internet subculture orbiting around channels like yours. Don't you live in a peaceful countryside community? Get out of the internet for some minutes and talk with your neighbours if you forgot what an average right leaning person believes.

Author kurumais ( ago)
because there are only 2 sides now

Embed Video:

URL 
Link 

Search Video

Top Videos

Videos

Analyse website